Delphin INKS 3000X vs Shimano Ocea Conquest HG 201X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Delphin INKS
Spinning
54.70 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.55 out of 10
Ergonomics6.13 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag-
Weight260g / 9.17oz
Line retireve per crank-
Ball bearings3+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €22.95
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.16/420

Shimano Ocea Conquest HG
Seafishing
201x
66.70 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics5.99 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight285g / 10.05oz
Line retireve per crank78 centimeter / 30.71 inch
Ball bearings11
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSeafishing
- Price range~ €477.10
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size201
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationLeft
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.24/200
Conclusion
Shimano Ocea Conquest HG 201X edges out Delphin INKS 3000X with slightly better overall performance, especially on the line retrieve per crank (78 centimeter / 30.71 inch) and the durability (9.5 out of 10). Still, Delphin INKS 3000X holds its own with strengths like a gear ratio of 5.1:1 and a ball bearings of 3+1, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Delphin INKS and Shimano Ocea Conquest HG?
Delphin INKS 3000X
- Thanks to its 7 out of 10 (5.1:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (3+1) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Shimano Ocea Conquest HG 201X
- A line retrieval (per crank) of 78 centimeter / 30.71 inch helps bringing in line quickly, making it great for repositioning or working topwater baits
- Built tough for the salt, ideal for seafishing.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 23 Saltiga 5000-HX vs Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 5000 HGX


Penn 2020 Clash II 2000X vs Daiwa BG MQ 4000D-XHX


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2000X vs Daiwa 24 Certate SW 6000-XHX


Daiwa 21 Certate SW 10000-HX vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2000X


Daiwa BG MQ 4000D-XHX vs Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 5000 HGX


Daiwa 23 Caldia SW 4000D-CXHX vs Shimano 2020 Saragosa SW A 8000 HGX


Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 4000-CX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 5000D-CX


Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 4000-CX vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2000X


Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 5000 HGX vs Penn 2020 Clash II 2000X


Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500DX vs Daiwa BG MQ 20000X


Shimano Stradic SWB 8000HGX vs Penn 2020 Clash II 2000X


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 3000DX vs Daiwa 23 Caldia SW 4000D-CXHX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT6000X vs Shimano Stradic SWB 8000HGX


Penn 2020 Clash II 2000X vs Daiwa 24 Certate SW 6000-XHX


Daiwa 21 Certate SW 10000-HX vs Shimano Catana 2500 RC


Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 4000-CX vs Penn 2020 Clash II 2000X


Shimano 2020 Saragosa SW A 5000 XGX vs Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 4000-CX


Daiwa 23 Caldia SW 4000D-CXHX vs Daiwa BG MQ 20000X


Daiwa 21 Certate SW 10000-HX vs Daiwa 23 Caldia SW 4000D-CXHX


Shimano Stradic SWB 8000HGX vs Daiwa 23 Caldia SW 4000D-CXHX
