Delphin INKS 3000X vs Shimano Vanquish FC 2500SCX

Delphin INKS
Spinning
54.70 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.55 out of 10
Ergonomics6.13 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag-
Weight260g / 9.17oz
Line retireve per crank-
Ball bearings3+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €22.95
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.16/420

Shimano Vanquish FC
Spinning
88.20 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.45 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag4kg / 8.82lbs
Weight165g / 5.82oz
Line retireve per crank75 centimeter / 29.53 inch
Ball bearings12
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €407.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500SC
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.18/120
Conclusion
Shimano Vanquish FC 2500SCX clearly outshines Delphin INKS 3000X, offering significantly better performance in durability (9.5 out of 10) and line retrieve per crank (75 centimeter / 29.53 inch). While Delphin INKS 3000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Vanquish FC 2500SCX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Delphin INKS and Shimano Vanquish FC?
Delphin INKS 3000X
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (3+1) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Shimano Vanquish FC 2500SCX
- Designed with a light drag at 5.69 out of 10 (4kg / 8,82lbs), the reel is perfect when you're going after small fish or using ultralight setups
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.71 out of 10 (75 centimeter / 29.53 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Shimano Sedona FJ C5000XGFJX vs Shimano Stella FK 4000 MX


Shimano Sedona FJ C5000XGFJX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000DX


Shimano Complex XR 2500 HGX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2500X


Shimano Stella FK 4000 MX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2500X


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 5000-CX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 1000DX


Shimano Ultegra C3000XGDX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 1000DX


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2000X


Shimano 21 Sahara FJ 2500SHGFJX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000DX


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 2500X vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2000X


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 3000-C / JB4 0.19MM YELLOW 3000-CX vs Penn FIERCE IV 3000X


Shimano Complex XR 2500X vs Shimano Ultegra C3000XGDX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 3000-C / JB4 0.19MM YELLOW 3000-CX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2000X


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 2500X vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 6000DX


Shimano Stella FK 4000 MX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 3000-C / JB4 0.19MM YELLOW 3000-CX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2000X vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 2500X


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Complex XR 2500 HGX


Shimano Complex XR 2500 HGX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2500X vs Shimano 21 Sustain 3000 HGFJX


Shimano Complex XR 2500 HGX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000DX


Penn FIERCE IV 3000X vs Shimano Stella FK 4000 MX
