Delphin INKS 4000X vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Delphin INKS
Spinning
56.70 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.57 out of 10
Ergonomics6.07 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag-
Weight280g / 9.88oz
Line retireve per crank-
Ball bearings3+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €23.95
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.18/470

Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD
Feeder And Match
90.30 out of 100
Value for money5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics5.94 out of 10
Gear ratio4.7:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight300g / 10.58oz
Line retireve per crank79 centimeter / 31.1 inch
Ball bearings10
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €292.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3010
- Handle typeDouble handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.26/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX clearly outshines Delphin INKS 4000X, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (12kg / 26,46lbs) and durability (9.5 out of 10). While Delphin INKS 4000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Delphin INKS and Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD?
Delphin INKS 4000X
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (3+1) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX
- With a maximum drag of 10 out of 10 (12kg / 26,46lbs), this reel offers excellent stopping power, giving fishermen the confidence to handle pressure situations with ease
- This reel provides steady retrieval 79 centimeter / 31.1 inch (6.29 out of 10), good enough for most feeder and match scenarios
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for feeder and match conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa Ninja LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2500X


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 2000D-XH 2000D-XHX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 3000-CXHX


Daiwa 24 TDR QD 2508QDX vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QD-DHX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2500X vs Shimano Twin Power XD A C 3000 HGX


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 2000D-XH 2000D-XHX vs Daiwa 24 IPRIMI LT 2000 S-PX


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 2000D-XH 2000D-XHX vs Shimano AERO XR C3000X


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2500X vs Daiwa TD Match 3012X


Shimano AERO XR C3000X vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2500X


Daiwa 24 TDR QD 2508QDX vs Shimano Twin Power XD A C 3000 HGX


Daiwa 24 IPRIMI LT 2000 S-PX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 5000-CX


Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 XGX vs Shimano Vanford FA C2000HGAX


Daiwa 24 TDR QD 2508QDX vs Daiwa 21 TOURNAMENT FEEDER 25QD


Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 6000 SS-PX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2500X


Daiwa 24 TDR QD 2508QDX vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 2000D-XH 2000D-XHX


Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 6000 SS-PX vs Shimano Twin Power XD A C 3000 HGX


Cormoran Veycor Feeder 5PiF vs Daiwa 24 IPRIMI LT 2000 S-PX


Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QD-DHX vs Shimano AERO XR C5000X


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 2000D-XH 2000D-XHX vs Cormoran Veycor Feeder 5PiF


Daiwa Ninja LT 3000-CXHX vs Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 XGX


Delphin REDIX vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 2000D-XH 2000D-XHX
