Delphin INKS 4000X vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000-XHX

Delphin INKS
Spinning
56.70 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.57 out of 10
Ergonomics6.07 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag-
Weight280g / 9.88oz
Line retireve per crank-
Ball bearings3+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €23.95
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.18/470

Daiwa 22 Exist LT
Spinning
95.00 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.33 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight200g / 7.05oz
Line retireve per crank99 centimeter / 38.98 inch
Ball bearings12
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €649.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000-XH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000-XHX clearly outshines Delphin INKS 4000X, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (10kg / 22,05lbs) and line retrieve per crank (99 centimeter / 38.98 inch). While Delphin INKS 4000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000-XHX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Delphin INKS and Daiwa 22 Exist LT?
Delphin INKS 4000X
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (3+1) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000-XHX
- With a great drag score 9.6 out of 10 (10kg / 22,05lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- A high retrieve rate of 9.4 out of 10 (99 centimeter / 38.98 inch), means the reel is made just for speed, perfect for speed fishing or covering water quickly
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Cormoran Sportline 2PiF vs Shimano Stradic GTM 2500 RC Spinning reel with fighting drag


Penn Battle III 8000 HSX vs Delphin SHARX 6000X


Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 4000-CXHX


Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF vs Shimano Super 4000 GT RD


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 3000D-CX vs Shimano Twin Power XD A C 3000 XGX


Penn Battle III 8000 HSX vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 3000D-CX


Delphin SHARX 6000X vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 2500X


Shimano Vanquish FC C2500SCX vs Daiwa Regal LT 2000 DX


Delphin SHARX 6000X vs Shimano Vanquish FC C2500SCX


Shimano Twin Power XD A C 3000 XGX vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 2500X


Daiwa Ninja LT 6000X vs Shimano Vanquish FC C2500SCX


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2500X vs Delphin SHARX 6000X


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2500X vs Shimano Vanquish FC C2500SCX


Daiwa Ninja LT 6000X vs Daiwa 19 Certate 2500DX


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 1000X vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 3000D-CX


Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX vs Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 4000-CX


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 1000X vs Shimano Super 4000 GT RD


Shimano Super 4000 GT RD vs Daiwa 19 Certate 2500DX


Cormoran Sportline 2PiF vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 2500X


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 3000D-CX vs Daiwa 19 Certate 2500DX
