Delphin INKS 4000X vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 5000D-CX

Delphin INKS
Spinning
56.70 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.57 out of 10
Ergonomics6.07 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag-
Weight280g / 9.88oz
Line retireve per crank-
Ball bearings3+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €23.95
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.18/470

Daiwa 22 Exist LT
Spinning
95.00 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.28 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight215g / 7.58oz
Line retireve per crank87 centimeter / 34.25 inch
Ball bearings12
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €729.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size5000D-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.4/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 22 Exist LT 5000D-CX clearly outshines Delphin INKS 4000X, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (10kg / 22,05lbs) and line retrieve per crank (87 centimeter / 34.25 inch). While Delphin INKS 4000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 22 Exist LT 5000D-CX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Delphin INKS and Daiwa 22 Exist LT?
Delphin INKS 4000X
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (3+1) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Daiwa 22 Exist LT 5000D-CX
- With a great drag score 9.6 out of 10 (10kg / 22,05lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- 8.2 out of 10 (87 centimeter / 34.25 inch) in line retrieve, means it picks up line fast, very handy when chasing quick fish
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 5000D-CXHX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000D-CX


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 3000D-CX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 5000-CX


Shimano Vanford FA C3000HGAX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000XGFEX


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000D-CX vs Delphin MonoDRAG 4000X


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 5000-CX


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 4000D-CX


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X vs Daiwa Ninja LT 2500-XHX


Shimano 20 Stella 6000 XGX vs Shimano Vanford FA C3000HGAX


Delphin MonoDRAG 4000X vs Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 2000X


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000D-CX vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 5000D-CXHX


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000D-CX vs Daiwa 19 Certate 4000CXHX


Shimano 20 Stella 6000 XGX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CXHX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 4000DX vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 3000D-CX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 4000DX vs Delphin MonoDRAG 4000X


Shimano Twin Power FE 4000XGFEX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 2500-XHX


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 3000D-CX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 4000DX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CXHX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000D-CX


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000D-CX vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 4000D-CX


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 5000-CX vs Shimano 20 Stella 6000 XGX


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 2500SX
