Delphin INKS 4000X vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500DX

Delphin INKS
Spinning
56.70 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.57 out of 10
Ergonomics6.07 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag-
Weight280g / 9.88oz
Line retireve per crank-
Ball bearings3+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €23.95
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.18/470

Daiwa 22 Exist LT
Spinning
95.00 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.43 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight170g / 6oz
Line retireve per crank73 centimeter / 28.74 inch
Ball bearings12
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €642.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizePC 2500D
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500DX clearly outshines Delphin INKS 4000X, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (10kg / 22,05lbs) and durability (9.5 out of 10). While Delphin INKS 4000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500DX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Delphin INKS and Daiwa 22 Exist LT?
Delphin INKS 4000X
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (3+1) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500DX
- With a great drag score 9.6 out of 10 (10kg / 22,05lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.43 out of 10 (73 centimeter / 28.74 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000-HX vs Delphin SHARX 6000X


Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 2500DX vs Penn FIERCE IV 3000X


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CX vs Penn FIERCE IV 3000X


Abu GARCIA Revo MGX 20 SP/LX vs Daiwa GS LTD 3000X


Delphin SHARX 6000X vs Daiwa RX LT 3000-CX


Daiwa RX LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Catana FE C 3000X


Delphin SHARX 6000X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT3000-CXHX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT4000-CX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000-HX


Shimano Twin Power FE 2500SHGFEX vs Daiwa GS LTD 3000X


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2000S-XHX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2000S-XHX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000-HX


Daiwa Crossfire LT 5000-CX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000D-CX


Delphin SHARX 6000X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2500-XHX


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000X vs Delphin SHARX 6000X


Shimano Twin Power FE 2500SHGFEX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000-HX


Delphin SHARX 6000X vs Daiwa GS LTD 3000X


Delphin SHARX 6000X vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000-HX


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000D-CX vs Daiwa GS LTD 3000X


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000D-CX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT4000-CX


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000D-CX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000-HX
