Delphin INKS 4000X vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 4000-CPX

Delphin INKS
Spinning
56.70 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.57 out of 10
Ergonomics6.07 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag-
Weight280g / 9.88oz
Line retireve per crank-
Ball bearings3+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €23.95
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.18/470

Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT
Spinning
55.40 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability7.69 out of 10
Ergonomics6.23 out of 10
Gear ratio4.7:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight230g / 8.11oz
Line retireve per crank75 centimeter / 29.53 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €89.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000-CP
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150
Conclusion
Both Delphin INKS 4000X and Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 4000-CPX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Delphin INKS 4000X offers a gear ratio of 5.2:1, while Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 4000-CPX stands out for a maximum drag of 12kg / 26,46lbs. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Delphin INKS and Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT?
Delphin INKS 4000X
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8 out of 10 (5.2:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 4000-CPX
- With a great drag score 10 out of 10 (12kg / 26,46lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.71 out of 10 (75 centimeter / 29.53 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000 DHX vs Delphin INKS 4000X


Shimano Twin Power FD 4000X vs Shimano Complex XR 2500 HGX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 3000D-CX


Daiwa Ninja LT 3000D-CX vs Shimano Vanford FA C3000XGAX


Shimano Vanford FA C3000XGAX vs Penn FIERCE IV 2500X


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2500-XHX vs Shimano TWIN POWER FD C3000MHG


Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000 DHX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CXHX


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CXHX vs Shimano 21 Sustain 3000 HGFJX


Shimano TWIN POWER FD C3000MHG vs Shimano 21 Sahara FJ 2500SHGFJX


Penn FIERCE IV 2500X vs Shimano Vanford FA C3000XGAX


Shimano Twin Power FE 2500SHGFEX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 4000-CX


Shimano 21 Sahara FJ 2500SHGFJX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 3000D-CXHX


Shimano Twin Power FD 4000X vs Shimano TWIN POWER FD C3000MHG


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT1000X vs Daiwa Ninja LT 3000D-CX


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 1000X


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2500-XHX


Delphin INKS 4000X vs Shimano Vanford FA C3000XGAX


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 3000D-CXHX vs Shimano 21 Sahara FJ 2500SHGFJX


Daiwa Ninja LT 3000D-CX vs Shimano Complex XR 2500 HGX


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 3000D-CXHX vs Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000 DHX
