Delphin INKS 4000X vs Shimano Tiagra 130AX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Delphin INKS
Spinning
56.70 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.57 out of 10
Ergonomics6.07 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag-
Weight280g / 9.88oz
Line retireve per crank-
Ball bearings3+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €23.95
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.18/470

Shimano Tiagra
Multireels
89.30 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics3.4 out of 10
Gear ratio2.1:1 / 1:1
Maximum drag40kg / 88.18lbs
Weight4935g / 174.08oz
Line retireve per crank98 centimeter / 38.58 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €1,099.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size130A
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeLever drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofil-
Conclusion
Shimano Tiagra 130AX clearly outshines Delphin INKS 4000X, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (40kg / 88,18lbs) and line retrieve per crank (98 centimeter / 38.58 inch). While Delphin INKS 4000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Tiagra 130AX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Delphin INKS and Shimano Tiagra?
Delphin INKS 4000X
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8 out of 10 (5.2:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- With a score like 8.13 out of 10 (280g / 9,88oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
Shimano Tiagra 130AX
- With a serious drag score of 10 out of 10 (40kg / 88,18lbs), this reel is made to stop big carp in their tracks, even in rough terrain or tight swims
- With a high retrieve rate of 9.2 out of 10 (98 centimeter / 38.58 inch), this reel is built for quick line recovery
- Ready for saltwater, great for any multireels adventure.
Similar comparisons

Shimano 21 Sustain 2500 HGFJX vs Shimano TLD II A 30 IIX


Shimano Tiagra 16X vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX


Shimano TLD II A 30 IIX vs Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 2000X


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LH-Left handX vs Shimano TLD II A 30 IIX


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LH-Left handX vs Daiwa 19 Certate 3000DX


Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 2000X vs Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 25IIX vs Shimano Sahara FJ 4000 XGX


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 3000DX vs Shimano 21 Sustain 2500 HGFJX


Shimano Tekota 501 HGA / Left-handedX vs Shimano 21 Sustain 2500 HGFJX


Shimano Tekota 501 HGA / Left-handedX vs Shimano Sahara FJ 4000 XGX


Shimano TLD II A 30 IIX vs Daiwa Tanacom 500


Shimano Tiagra 16X vs Shimano TLD II A 30 IIX


Shimano Sahara 1000 R vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 4000D-CXH 4000D-CXHX


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LH-Left handX vs Shimano 21 Sustain 2500 HGFJX


Shimano Torium 50HGA / Right HandX vs Daiwa 19 Certate 3000DX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX vs Shimano Torium 50HGA / Right HandX


Daiwa 19 Certate 3000DX vs Shimano TLD II A 30 IIX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 25IIX vs Daiwa 19 Certate 3000DX


Daiwa 19 Certate 3000DX vs Shimano Torium 50HGA / Right HandX


Shimano 21 Sustain 2500 HGFJX vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 3000DX
