Delphin INKS 4000X vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000PGFEX

Delphin INKS
Spinning
56.70 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.57 out of 10
Ergonomics6.07 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag-
Weight280g / 9.88oz
Line retireve per crank-
Ball bearings3+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €23.95
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.18/470

Shimano Twin Power FE
Spinning
66.40 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.57 out of 10
Ergonomics6.12 out of 10
Gear ratio4.4:1
Maximum drag11kg / 24.25lbs
Weight265g / 9.35oz
Line retireve per crank72 centimeter / 28.35 inch
Ball bearings9+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €399.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000PGFE
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/180
Conclusion
Both Delphin INKS 4000X and Shimano Twin Power FE 4000PGFEX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Delphin INKS 4000X offers a ball bearings of 3+1, while Shimano Twin Power FE 4000PGFEX stands out for a maximum drag of 11kg / 24,25lbs. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Delphin INKS and Shimano Twin Power FE?
Delphin INKS 4000X
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8 out of 10 (5.2:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (3+1) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Shimano Twin Power FE 4000PGFEX
- With a great drag score 10 out of 10 (11kg / 24,25lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.29 out of 10 (72 centimeter / 28.35 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
Similar comparisons

Mitchell MX2 Spinning 3000X vs Daiwa 21 Presso LT 1000 S-PX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 3000-C / JB4 0.19MM YELLOW 3000-CX vs Daiwa 21 Presso LT 1000 S-PX


Daiwa 21 Presso LT 1000 S-PX vs Delphin BRONZ 3000X


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2500X vs Shimano Vanquish FC C3000MHGCX


Mitchell MX2 Spinning 3000X vs Daiwa Regal LT 2000 DX


Daiwa 21 Presso LT 1000 S-PX vs Shimano Stella FK 4000 XGX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 6000DX vs Delphin BRONZ 3000X


Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 4000-CX vs Shimano Stella FK 4000 XGX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000D-CX vs Daiwa 21 Presso LT 1000 S-PX


Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 4000-CX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 2500SX


Shimano Stella FK 4000 XGX vs Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 4000-CX


Daiwa 21 Presso LT 1000 S-PX vs Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 4000-CX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2500X vs Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 PGX


Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 4000-CX vs Shimano Vanquish FC C3000MHGCX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 2500SX vs Daiwa Regal LT 2000 DX


Delphin ELIXIR 2000X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 3000-C / JB4 0.19MM YELLOW 3000-CX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 3000-C / JB4 0.19MM YELLOW 3000-CX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 2500SX


Shimano Vanquish FC C3000MHGCX vs Daiwa Crossfire LT 1000X


Shimano Vanquish FC C3000MHGCX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000D-CX


Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 PGX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 3000-C / JB4 0.19MM YELLOW 3000-CX
