Delphin INKS 5000X vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Delphin INKS
Spinning
56.60 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.58 out of 10
Ergonomics6.03 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag-
Weight290g / 10.23oz
Line retireve per crank-
Ball bearings3+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €24.95
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size5000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.2/450

Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD
Feeder And Match
90.30 out of 100
Value for money5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics5.94 out of 10
Gear ratio4.7:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight300g / 10.58oz
Line retireve per crank79 centimeter / 31.1 inch
Ball bearings10
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €292.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3010
- Handle typeDouble handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.26/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX clearly outshines Delphin INKS 5000X, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (12kg / 26,46lbs) and durability (9.5 out of 10). While Delphin INKS 5000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Delphin INKS and Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD?
Delphin INKS 5000X
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (3+1) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX
- With a maximum drag of 10 out of 10 (12kg / 26,46lbs), this reel offers excellent stopping power, giving fishermen the confidence to handle pressure situations with ease
- This reel provides steady retrieval 79 centimeter / 31.1 inch (6.29 out of 10), good enough for most feeder and match scenarios
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for feeder and match conditions.
Similar comparisons

Shimano Twin Power FE 4000PGFEX vs Shimano Ultegra C2000SHGDX


Delphin RAYA body vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Feeder LT 6000-SS (Feeder)X


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 2500X vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 5000 HGX


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 5000 HGX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 2500X


Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD vs Mitchell 308 2000X


Delphin RAYA body vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 5000-CX


Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 3000X vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000-XHX


Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 5000-CX


Shimano AERO XR 4000X vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 2500X


Shimano AERO XR 4000X vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX vs Mitchell 308 2000X


Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD vs Shimano Ultegra C2000SHGDX


Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 3000X vs Shimano Catana FE 2500X


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 2500X vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Feeder LT 6000-SS (Feeder)X


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X vs Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Feeder LT 6000-SS (Feeder)X


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000-XHX vs Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 5000 HGX vs Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 6000SSX vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 2508QDX


Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 3000X vs Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 6000 SS-PX
