Delphin INKS 5000X vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Delphin INKS
Spinning
56.60 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.58 out of 10
Ergonomics6.03 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag-
Weight290g / 10.23oz
Line retireve per crank-
Ball bearings3+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €24.95
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size5000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.2/450

Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD
Feeder And Match
90.40 out of 100
Value for money5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics5.97 out of 10
Gear ratio4.7:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight290g / 10.23oz
Line retireve per crank79 centimeter / 31.1 inch
Ball bearings10
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €292.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3010
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.26/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX clearly outshines Delphin INKS 5000X, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (12kg / 26,46lbs) and durability (9.5 out of 10). While Delphin INKS 5000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Delphin INKS and Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD?
Delphin INKS 5000X
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (3+1) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX
- With a maximum drag of 10 out of 10 (12kg / 26,46lbs), this reel offers excellent stopping power, giving fishermen the confidence to handle pressure situations with ease
- This reel provides steady retrieval 79 centimeter / 31.1 inch (6.29 out of 10), good enough for most feeder and match scenarios
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for feeder and match conditions.
Similar comparisons

Cormoran Veycor Feeder 5PiF vs Daiwa TD Match 3012X


Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 6000SS-CPX vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 1000 SX


Shimano 20 Stella 6000 HGX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 1000DX


Daiwa TD Match 3012X vs Shimano 21 Sahara FJ 2500SHGFJX


Abu GARCIA Zenon 1000 SX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2500X


Shimano Sedona FJ 2500HGFJX vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 2508QDX


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 2508QDX


Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QD-DHX vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500D-XHX


Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 6000SS-CPX vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QDX


Daiwa 24 TDR QD 2508QDX vs Cormoran Veycor Feeder 5PiF


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 1000DX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2500(U)X


Abu GARCIA Zenon 1000 SX vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QDX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 5000D-CX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 6000SS-CPX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2500X


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa TD FEEDER QD


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 5000D-CX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2500X


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2500(U)X vs Cormoran Veycor Feeder 5PiF


Cormoran Veycor Feeder 5PiF vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 6000SS-CPX


Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 6000SS-CPX vs Cormoran Veycor Feeder 5PiF


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 1000DX vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 2508QDX
