Delphin INKS 5000X vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 5000D-CX

Delphin INKS
Spinning
56.60 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.58 out of 10
Ergonomics6.03 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag-
Weight290g / 10.23oz
Line retireve per crank-
Ball bearings3+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €24.95
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size5000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.2/450

Daiwa 22 Exist LT
Spinning
95.00 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.28 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight215g / 7.58oz
Line retireve per crank87 centimeter / 34.25 inch
Ball bearings12
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €729.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size5000D-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.4/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 22 Exist LT 5000D-CX clearly outshines Delphin INKS 5000X, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (10kg / 22,05lbs) and line retrieve per crank (87 centimeter / 34.25 inch). While Delphin INKS 5000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 22 Exist LT 5000D-CX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Delphin INKS and Daiwa 22 Exist LT?
Delphin INKS 5000X
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (3+1) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Daiwa 22 Exist LT 5000D-CX
- With a great drag score 9.6 out of 10 (10kg / 22,05lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- 8.2 out of 10 (87 centimeter / 34.25 inch) in line retrieve, means it picks up line fast, very handy when chasing quick fish
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CXHX vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 3000-HX


Shimano Vanquish FC 4000MHGCX vs Daiwa 21 Presso LT 1000 S-PX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2500-XHX vs Daiwa Crossfire LT 4000-CX


Shimano Vanquish FC 4000MHGCX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 4000-CX


Shimano 20 Stella 6000 XGX vs Daiwa BG 3000X


Shimano Twin Power FD 4000PGX vs Shimano Sienna 2500X


Daiwa Ninja LT 3000D-CX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CXHX


Daiwa Ninja LT 3000D-CX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500DX


Shimano 20 Stella 6000 XGX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 3000-CX


Shimano Vanquish FC 4000MHGCX vs Shimano Stella FK C 3000 XGX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2500-XHX vs Daiwa BG 3000X


Daiwa 21 Presso LT 1000 S-PX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500DX


Daiwa Crossfire LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Twin Power FD 4000PGX


Daiwa BG 3000X vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500DX


Shimano 20 Stella 6000 XGX vs Shimano Twin Power FD 4000PGX


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 3000-HX vs Shimano Sienna 2500X


Daiwa Crossfire LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 3000-HX


Shimano Stella FK C 3000 XGX vs Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 2000X


Shimano Sienna 2500X vs Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 2000X


Shimano Twin Power FD 4000PGX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 3000-CX
