Delphin INKS 5000X vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 5000D-CX

Delphin INKS
Spinning
56.60 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.58 out of 10
Ergonomics6.03 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag-
Weight290g / 10.23oz
Line retireve per crank-
Ball bearings3+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €24.95
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size5000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.2/450

Daiwa 22 Exist LT
Spinning
95.00 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.28 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight215g / 7.58oz
Line retireve per crank87 centimeter / 34.25 inch
Ball bearings12
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €729.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size5000D-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.4/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 22 Exist LT 5000D-CX clearly outshines Delphin INKS 5000X, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (10kg / 22,05lbs) and line retrieve per crank (87 centimeter / 34.25 inch). While Delphin INKS 5000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 22 Exist LT 5000D-CX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Delphin INKS and Daiwa 22 Exist LT?
Delphin INKS 5000X
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (3+1) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Daiwa 22 Exist LT 5000D-CX
- With a great drag score 9.6 out of 10 (10kg / 22,05lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- 8.2 out of 10 (87 centimeter / 34.25 inch) in line retrieve, means it picks up line fast, very handy when chasing quick fish
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Shimano 20 Stella 18000 HGX vs Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 2500X


Shimano Twin Power FE 4000XGFEX vs Shimano Sahara FJ 2500X


Shimano Sahara FJ 2500X vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000XGFEX


Daiwa Regal LT 2500 DX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500DX


Shimano Twin Power FE 4000XGFEX vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CX vs Delphin HORNET 50X


Delphin HORNET 50X vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CX


Shimano Twin Power FD 1000X vs Daiwa Regal LT 2500 DX


Shimano Twin Power FD C3000XGX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000XGFEX


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 4000-CXHX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 2500X


Shimano Twin Power FD 1000X vs Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 2500X


Shimano Sahara FJ 2500X vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX


Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 2500X vs Shimano 20 Stella 18000 HGX


Shimano Twin Power FD C3000XGX vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX


Shimano Sahara FJ 2500X vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 5000D-CXHX


Shimano Stella FK C 3000X vs Shimano Twin Power FD 1000X


Shimano Stella FK C 3000X vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000XGFEX


Shimano Twin Power FE 4000XGFEX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CX


Shimano Stella FK C 3000X vs Shimano Sahara FJ 2500X
