Delphin INKS 5000X vs Penn International VISW 80 / Color: GoldX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Delphin INKS
Spinning
56.60 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.58 out of 10
Ergonomics6.03 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag-
Weight290g / 10.23oz
Line retireve per crank-
Ball bearings3+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €24.95
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size5000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.2/450

Penn International VISW
Multireels
64.70 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.98 out of 10
Ergonomics3.4 out of 10
Gear ratio3.1:1/1.5:1
Maximum drag29.4kg / 64,82lbs
Weight3205g / 113.05oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings5
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €979.00
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size80
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeLever drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.76/1435
Conclusion
Both Delphin INKS 5000X and Penn International VISW 80 / Color: GoldX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Delphin INKS 5000X offers a gear ratio of 5.2:1, while Penn International VISW 80 / Color: GoldX stands out for a line retrieve per crank of 102 centimeter / 40.16 inch. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Delphin INKS and Penn International VISW?
Delphin INKS 5000X
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8 out of 10 (5.2:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- With a score like 8.07 out of 10 (290g / 10,23oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
Penn International VISW 80 / Color: GoldX
- With a high retrieve rate of 9.47 out of 10 (102 centimeter / 40.16 inch), this reel is built for quick line recovery
Similar comparisons

Shimano Talica II 16IIAX vs Shimano Torium 16HGAL / Left-handedX


Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500X


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500 HGX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 3500C - Spinning reel with front drag


Shimano Tekota 500 HGA / Right handX vs Shimano Twin Power FD 1000X


Shimano Talica II 16IIAX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 3500C - Spinning reel with front drag


Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX vs Shimano Sahara 3000 SS DH HG R


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500X vs Shimano Tiagra 50WAX


Shimano Cardiff 301A vs Shimano Twin Power FD 1000X


Shimano Tiagra 50WAX vs Shimano Talica II 16IIAX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2500X vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 2500X


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 12IIX vs Shimano Talica II 16IIAX


Shimano Torium 40HGA / Right HandX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 4000D-CXHX


Shimano Twin Power FD 1000X vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CXHX


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500 HGX vs Shimano Torium 16HGAL / Left-handedX


Shimano Talica II 16IIAX vs Shimano Torium 40HGA / Right HandX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2500X vs Shimano Torium 16HGAL / Left-handedX


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500 HGX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2000S-XHX


Daiwa Sweepfire E 3500C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Shimano Tiagra 50WAX


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 2500X vs Shimano Tiagra 50WAX


Shimano Twin Power FD 1000X vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LH-Left handX
