Delphin INKS 6000X vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 SX

Delphin INKS
Spinning
44.40 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.6 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag-
Weight400g / 14.11oz
Line retireve per crank-
Ball bearings3+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €25.95
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size6000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.22/490

Abu GARCIA Zenon
Spinning
74.90 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.52 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag5.2kg / 11,46lbs
Weight143g / 5.04oz
Line retireve per crank73 centimeter / 28.74 inch
Ball bearings11
Technical Specifications
- BrandABU GARCIA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €326.00
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500 S
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.17/170
Conclusion
Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 SX clearly outshines Delphin INKS 6000X, offering significantly better performance in durability (9.5 out of 10) and line retrieve per crank (73 centimeter / 28.74 inch). While Delphin INKS 6000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 SX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Delphin INKS and Abu GARCIA Zenon?
Delphin INKS 6000X
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (3+1) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 SX
- Super lightweight thanks to its score and value 9.05 out of 10 (143g / 5,04oz), great reel for finesse fishing where comfort and control matter the most
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.43 out of 10 (73 centimeter / 28.74 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 6000X vs Shimano Sahara FJ C 5000 XGX


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX vs Delphin HORNET 30X


Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 4000X vs Shimano Sahara FJ C 5000 XGX


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX vs Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 2000X


Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 4000X vs Shimano Vanquish FC 4000XGCX


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa Regal LT 2500 DX


Delphin HORNET 30X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT1000X


Shimano Catana 2500 RC vs Shimano Sienna 1000X


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX vs Shimano Catana FE 2500X


Shimano Catana 2500 RC vs Shimano Sahara FJ C 5000 XGX


Shimano Sedona FJ 2500FJX vs Delphin HORNET 30X


Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 4000X vs Shimano Vanford FA 2500AX


Delphin HORNET 30X vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000S-HX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 6000X vs Shimano Sienna 1000X


Shimano Sedona FJ 2500FJX vs Delphin IXTREK 5000X


Shimano Sienna 1000X vs Penn 2020 Clash II 1000X


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 3000-CXH(U)X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT1000X


Daiwa Regal LT 2500 DX vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX


Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 4000X vs Shimano Catana 2500 RC


Penn 2020 Clash II 1000X vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 6000X
