Delphin INKS 6000X vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Delphin INKS
Spinning
44.40 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.6 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag-
Weight400g / 14.11oz
Line retireve per crank-
Ball bearings3+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €25.95
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size6000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.22/490

Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD
Feeder And Match
91.10 out of 100
Value for money5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio4.9:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight395g / 13.93oz
Line retireve per crank86 centimeter / 33.86 inch
Ball bearings8
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €199.00
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4012
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X clearly outshines Delphin INKS 6000X, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (12kg / 26,46lbs) and line retrieve per crank (86 centimeter / 33.86 inch). While Delphin INKS 6000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Delphin INKS and Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD?
Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X
- With a maximum drag of 10 out of 10 (12kg / 26,46lbs), this reel offers excellent stopping power, giving fishermen the confidence to handle pressure situations with ease
- A line retrieve score of 8.1 out of 10 86 centimeter / 33.86 inch), this reel offers quick and smooth line pickup, ideal for keeping up during active feeder sessions
Similar comparisons

Shimano AERO XR C3000X vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 4000-CXHX vs Mitchell 308 PRO 2000X


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX vs Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 1000X


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X vs Delphin REDIX


Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD vs Shimano Twin Power FD C3000XGX


Daiwa TD FEEDER QD vs Mitchell 308 PRO 2000X


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 6000SSX vs Shimano Vanford FA C3000XGAX


Daiwa TD FEEDER QD vs Shimano Twin Power FD 2500X


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X


Shimano Twin Power FD C3000XGX vs Mitchell 308 PRO 2000X


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X


Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 1000X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 6000SSX


Shimano Twin Power FD 2500X vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X


Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 4000-CXHX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2500X


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 4000-CXHX


Shimano Twin Power FD 2500X vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 6000SS-CPX


Shimano Twin Power FD C3000XGX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX


Shimano Twin Power FD C3000XGX vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X


Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 1000X vs Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD
