Delphin INKS 6000X vs Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 3000D-CX

Delphin INKS
Spinning
44.40 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.6 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag-
Weight400g / 14.11oz
Line retireve per crank-
Ball bearings3+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €25.95
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size6000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.22/490

Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT
Spinning
90.80 out of 100
Value for money5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight175g / 6.17oz
Line retireve per crank80 centimeter / 31.5 inch
Ball bearings11
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €226.80
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000D-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.33/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 3000D-CX clearly outshines Delphin INKS 6000X, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (10kg / 22,05lbs) and line retrieve per crank (80 centimeter / 31.5 inch). While Delphin INKS 6000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 3000D-CX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Delphin INKS and Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT?
Delphin INKS 6000X
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (3+1) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 3000D-CX
- With a great drag score 9.6 out of 10 (10kg / 22,05lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- With a score like 8.83 out of 10 (175g / 6,17oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- 6.43 out of 10 (80 centimeter / 31.5 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500DX vs Shimano Sedona C2000 HG SFI


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 1000D(U)X vs Delphin IXPERA 2000X


Shimano Sedona FJ 4000XGFJX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 4000-XHX vs Daiwa RX LT 2500X


Shimano Twin Power FE 3000XGFEX vs Shimano Sedona C2000 HG SFI


Delphin INKS 6000X vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 4000 SHX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 6000X vs Delphin IXPERA 2000X


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 4000-XHX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 1000D(U)X


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 1000D(U)X vs Shimano Sedona C2000 HG SFI


Daiwa 21 Presso LT 2000 SS-PX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 1000D(U)X


Abu GARCIA Zenon 4000 SHX vs Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX


Delphin IXPERA 2000X vs Shimano Sahara FJ 1000X


Shimano Aero 4000X vs Shimano Sahara FJ 1000X


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500DX vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 4000 SHX


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 4000D-CXHX vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 4000-XHX


Shimano Twin Power FE 5000XGFEX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 3000XGFEX


Shimano Twin Power FE 3000XGFEX vs Shimano Sahara FJ 1000X


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500DX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 3000XGFEX


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 4000D-CXHX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 6000X


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 4000XGFJX
