Delphin INKS 6000X vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 4000D-CX

Delphin INKS
Spinning
44.40 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.6 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag-
Weight400g / 14.11oz
Line retireve per crank-
Ball bearings3+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €25.95
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size6000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.22/490

Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT
Spinning
95.00 out of 100
Value for money5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.23 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight230g / 8.11oz
Line retireve per crank82 centimeter / 32.28 inch
Ball bearings8
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €218.10
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000D-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.37/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 4000D-CX clearly outshines Delphin INKS 6000X, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (12kg / 26,46lbs) and line retrieve per crank (82 centimeter / 32.28 inch). While Delphin INKS 6000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 4000D-CX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Delphin INKS and Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT?
Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 4000D-CX
- With a great drag score 10 out of 10 (12kg / 26,46lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- With a score like 8.47 out of 10 (230g / 8,11oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- 6.71 out of 10 (82 centimeter / 32.28 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
Similar comparisons

Shimano Catana FE 4000 HGX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 2500SHGFEX


Shimano Catana FE 4000 HGX vs Shimano Sahara FJ C 5000 XGX


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 2000X vs Shimano Catana FE 2500 HGX


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 2000X vs Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 2500X


Shimano Sahara FJ C 5000 XGX vs Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 2000X vs Shimano Sahara FJ C 5000 XGX


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2000DX vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 2000X


Shimano Sahara FJ C 5000 XGX vs Shimano Catana FE 2500 HGX


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 2000X vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2500X


Shimano Catana FE 4000 HGX vs Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 3000-CX


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 5000 HGX vs Shimano Catana FE 2500 HGX


Daiwa Fuego LT 3000D-CX vs Shimano Sahara FJ C 5000 XGX


Shimano Complex XR 2500X vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2000DX


Shimano Catana FE 2500 HGX vs Shimano Catana FE 4000 HGX


Shimano Complex XR 2500X vs Delphin BRONZ 6000X


Shimano Catana FE 4000 HGX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 6000DX


Daiwa Certate LT 19 5000D-XHX vs Shimano Complex XR 2500X


Shimano Catana FE 4000 HGX vs Delphin ELIXIR 3000X


Shimano Twin Power FE 2500SHGFEX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2500X


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2000DX vs Daiwa Certate LT 19 5000D-XHX
