Delphin INKS 6000X vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000S-HX

Delphin INKS
Spinning
44.40 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.6 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag-
Weight400g / 14.11oz
Line retireve per crank-
Ball bearings3+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €25.95
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size6000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.22/490

Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)
Spinning
85.50 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.53 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio5.8:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight175g / 6.17oz
Line retireve per crank76 centimeter / 29.92 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €159.80
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000S-H
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.14/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000S-HX clearly outshines Delphin INKS 6000X, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (5kg / 11,02lbs) and durability (8.53 out of 10). While Delphin INKS 6000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000S-HX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Delphin INKS and Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)?
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000S-HX
- A drag rating of 6.38 out of 10 (5kg / 11,02lbs) gives you steady control and it's perfect for most freshwater fish and light saltwater action
- With a score like 8.83 out of 10 (175g / 6,17oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.86 out of 10 (76 centimeter / 29.92 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Shimano Sedona 2500 HG FI vs Shimano Twin Power XD A C 5000 XGX


Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 5000D-CXHX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2500X vs Shimano Twin Power XD A C 5000 XGX


Daiwa 19 Certate 2500-XHX vs Shimano Sedona 2500 HG FI


Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2500-XHX


Penn 2020 Clash II 1000X vs Shimano Sedona 2500 HG FI


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT1000X vs Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 5000D-CXHX vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 4000-CX


Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X vs Shimano TWIN POWER FD C3000MHG


Daiwa 19 Certate 3000D-CX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2500-XHX


Daiwa 19 Certate 2500-XHX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT1000X


Daiwa 19 Certate 2500-XHX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2000X


Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 HGX vs Shimano Sedona 2500 HG FI


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX vs Daiwa 19 Certate 2500-XHX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT1000X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2500-XHX


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 4000-CXHX vs Shimano Ultegra C2000SDX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT1000X vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 4000-CX


Shimano TWIN POWER FD C3000MHG vs Penn FIERCE IV 2500X


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2500X vs Shimano Ultegra C2000SDX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT1000X vs Penn 2020 Clash II 1000X
