Delphin INKS 6000X vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000DX

Delphin INKS
Spinning
44.40 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.6 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag-
Weight400g / 14.11oz
Line retireve per crank-
Ball bearings3+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €25.95
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size6000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.22/490

Daiwa 22 Exist LT
Spinning
95.00 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.33 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight200g / 7.05oz
Line retireve per crank82 centimeter / 32.28 inch
Ball bearings12
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €655.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000D
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.37/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000DX clearly outshines Delphin INKS 6000X, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (10kg / 22,05lbs) and durability (9.5 out of 10). While Delphin INKS 6000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000DX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Delphin INKS and Daiwa 22 Exist LT?
Delphin INKS 6000X
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (3+1) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000DX
- With a great drag score 9.6 out of 10 (10kg / 22,05lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- With a score like 8.67 out of 10 (200g / 7,05oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- 6.71 out of 10 (82 centimeter / 32.28 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Shimano Sedona FJ 500 500X vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 1000DX


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 4000-XHX vs Shimano FX 1000 FCX


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 4000D-CX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 4000D-CX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 4000D-CX vs Penn Sargus II Spinning 2500X


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Ultegra C2000SHGDX


Shimano FX 2500 FCX vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 4000D-CX


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 3000CXHX vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 4000D-CX


Daiwa 19 Certate 2500DX vs Shimano FX 1000 FCX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 1000DX vs Shimano Stella FK 2500X


Penn Sargus II Spinning 2500X vs Shimano Sedona FJ 500 500X


Shimano Ultegra C2000SHGDX vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 4000D-CXHX


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 4000D-CX vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 4000D-CXHX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 4000D-CX vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 3000CXHX


Shimano FX 2500 FCX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 3000CXHX vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 4000D-CXHX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 3000-CX vs Shimano FX 1000 FCX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 1000DX vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 3000CXHX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 4000D-CXHX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 1000DX vs Shimano FX 1000 FCX


Shimano FX 1000 FCX vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 3000CXHX
