Delphin INKS 6000X vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 5000D-CX

Delphin INKS
Spinning
44.40 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.6 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag-
Weight400g / 14.11oz
Line retireve per crank-
Ball bearings3+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €25.95
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size6000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.22/490

Daiwa 22 Exist LT
Spinning
95.00 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.28 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight215g / 7.58oz
Line retireve per crank87 centimeter / 34.25 inch
Ball bearings12
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €729.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size5000D-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.4/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 22 Exist LT 5000D-CX clearly outshines Delphin INKS 6000X, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (10kg / 22,05lbs) and line retrieve per crank (87 centimeter / 34.25 inch). While Delphin INKS 6000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 22 Exist LT 5000D-CX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Delphin INKS and Daiwa 22 Exist LT?
Delphin INKS 6000X
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (3+1) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Daiwa 22 Exist LT 5000D-CX
- With a great drag score 9.6 out of 10 (10kg / 22,05lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- With a score like 8.57 out of 10 (215g / 7,58oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- 8.2 out of 10 (87 centimeter / 34.25 inch) in line retrieve, means it picks up line fast, very handy when chasing quick fish
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Delphin INKS 5000X vs Shimano Stella FK 4000 XGX


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) FC 2000-PX vs Shimano Complex XR 2500X


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 2500SX vs Daiwa 17 Prorex LT 4000 D-CX


Daiwa 17 Prorex LT 4000 D-CX vs Delphin CarbonIX 2000X


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) FC 2000-PX vs Daiwa BG 4500X


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 2500SX vs Delphin CarbonIX 2000X


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 1000DX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CX


Shimano Stella FK 4000 XGX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 2000 / JB4 0.13MM YELOW 2000X


Delphin INKS 5000X vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2500D(U)X


Shimano 21 Sustain 2500 HGFJX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 5000D-CX


Daiwa BG 4500X vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CX


Shimano Ultegra C2000SDX vs Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 4000-CX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 4000-CX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 2000 / JB4 0.13MM YELOW 2000X vs Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 4000-CX


Daiwa BG 4500X vs Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 4000-CX


Delphin CarbonIX 2000X vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 2500SX


Daiwa 17 Prorex LT 4000 D-CX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2500D(U)X


Shimano Complex XR 2500X vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 3000-CXHX


Daiwa BG 4500X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 2000 / JB4 0.13MM YELOW 2000X


Shimano Stella FK 4000 XGX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 1000DX
