Delphin INKS 6000X vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QDX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Delphin INKS
Spinning
44.40 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.6 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag-
Weight400g / 14.11oz
Line retireve per crank-
Ball bearings3+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €25.95
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size6000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.22/490

Daiwa 24 TDR QD
Feeder And Match
84.60 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics5.99 out of 10
Gear ratio4.8:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight285g / 10.05oz
Line retireve per crank79 centimeter / 31.1 inch
Ball bearings8+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €229.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3012QD
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QDX clearly outshines Delphin INKS 6000X, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (12kg / 26,46lbs) and line retrieve per crank (79 centimeter / 31.1 inch). While Delphin INKS 6000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QDX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Delphin INKS and Daiwa 24 TDR QD?
Delphin INKS 6000X
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (3+1) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QDX
- With a maximum drag of 10 out of 10 (12kg / 26,46lbs), this reel offers excellent stopping power, giving fishermen the confidence to handle pressure situations with ease
- Rated 8.37 out of 10 (285g / 10,05oz) in weight, this reel strikes a great balance between sturdiness and lightness, making it great for consistent feeder casting
- This reel provides steady retrieval 79 centimeter / 31.1 inch (6.29 out of 10), good enough for most feeder and match scenarios
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX


Daiwa Nzon Distance 25 vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 4010 / Single crankX


Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500DX


Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 S x vs Daiwa 21 TOURNAMENT FEEDER 25QD


Shimano AERO XR C5000X vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 3000-CX


Daiwa Nzon Distance 25 vs Shimano AERO XR C5000X


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa TD Match 4012X


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2000X vs Shimano Sedona FJ C3000HGFJX


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 4000-XHX vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QD-DHX


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 4000-XHX vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500DX


Daiwa 21 TOURNAMENT FEEDER 25QD vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 4000-XHX


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 4010 / Single crankX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT3000-CXHX


Daiwa 21 TOURNAMENT FEEDER 25QD vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT3000-CXHX


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2000X


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2000X vs Daiwa TD Match 4012X


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 4000-XHX vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 2508QDX


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500DX vs Shimano AERO XR C5000X


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 4010 / Single crankX vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2500 S-XHX


Shimano AERO XR C5000X vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 4000-XHX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 3000-C(U)X vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2500 S-XHX
