Delphin INKS 6000X vs Daiwa Lexa E LT 19 3000X

Delphin INKS
Spinning
44.40 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.6 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag-
Weight400g / 14.11oz
Line retireve per crank-
Ball bearings3+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €25.95
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size6000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.22/490

Daiwa Lexa E LT 19
Spinning
3000x
86.50 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.13 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight260g / 9.17oz
Line retireve per crank77 centimeter / 30.31 inch
Ball bearings5
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €129.00
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/150
Conclusion
Daiwa Lexa E LT 19 3000X clearly outshines Delphin INKS 6000X, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (10kg / 22,05lbs) and line retrieve per crank (77 centimeter / 30.31 inch). While Delphin INKS 6000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa Lexa E LT 19 3000X is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Delphin INKS and Daiwa Lexa E LT 19?
Daiwa Lexa E LT 19 3000X
- With a great drag score 9.6 out of 10 (10kg / 22,05lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- With a score like 8.27 out of 10 (260g / 9,17oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- 6 out of 10 (77 centimeter / 30.31 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Shimano Stella FK C 5000 XGX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2500-XHX


Shimano Sahara 1000 R vs Shimano Vanquish FC C3000XGCX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 6000DX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT4000-CX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT4000-CX vs Shimano Sahara 3000 SS DH HG R


Shimano Sahara 3000 SS DH HG R vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2000 S-XHX


Shimano FX 2500 HG FCX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT4000-CX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 6000DX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2500-XHX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT4000-CX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000DX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CXHX vs Shimano Sahara 3000 SS DH HG R


Shimano FX 2500 HG FCX vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 4000D-CX


Shimano FX 2500 HG FCX vs Shimano Vanford FA C3000AX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 6000DX vs Shimano Vanford FA C3000AX


Shimano Vanford FA C3000AX vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 2000X


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 6000DX vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2000 S-XHX


Shimano Sahara 1000 R vs Shimano FX 2500 HG FCX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2000X vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 17 Prorex LT 4000 D-CX vs Shimano Sahara 1000 R


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000DX vs Shimano Sedona 2500 HG FI


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2000 S-XHX vs Shimano Sahara 3000 SS DH HG R


Shimano Sahara 3000 SS DH HG R vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2500-XHX
