Delphin INKS 6000X vs Daiwa Regal LT 2500 DX

Delphin INKS
Spinning
44.40 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.6 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag-
Weight400g / 14.11oz
Line retireve per crank-
Ball bearings3+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €25.95
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size6000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.22/490

Daiwa Regal LT
Spinning
54.30 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics6.3 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight210g / 7.41oz
Line retireve per crank75 centimeter / 29.53 inch
Ball bearings9
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €52.90
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500 D
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150
Conclusion
Daiwa Regal LT 2500 DX clearly outshines Delphin INKS 6000X, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (10kg / 22,05lbs) and line retrieve per crank (75 centimeter / 29.53 inch). While Delphin INKS 6000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa Regal LT 2500 DX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Delphin INKS and Daiwa Regal LT?
Delphin INKS 6000X
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (3+1) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Daiwa Regal LT 2500 DX
- With a great drag score 9.6 out of 10 (10kg / 22,05lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- With a score like 8.6 out of 10 (210g / 7,41oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.71 out of 10 (75 centimeter / 29.53 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
Similar comparisons

Shimano Stella FK 4000 MX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 5000D-CX


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 3000DX vs Shimano Vanford FA C2500SAX


Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 PGX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 5000D-CX


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 1000X vs Shimano Vanford FA C2500SAX


Shimano Vanquish FC 4000XGCX vs Shimano Ultegra C2000SHGDX


Shimano Sienna 1000X vs Shimano Vanford FA C2500SAX


Shimano Sedona 500 FI vs Shimano Vanford FA C2500SAX


Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 PGX vs Shimano Aero BB 4000X


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 4000 HGX vs Shimano Aero BB 4000X


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) FC 2500X vs Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 PGX


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 4000 HGX vs Shimano Sienna 1000X


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 2500X vs Daiwa BG 3500X


Shimano Stella FK 4000 MX vs Shimano Sedona FJ C3000FJX


Penn Battle III 8000 HSX vs Shimano Sahara FJ 500X


Daiwa BG 3500X vs Penn Battle III 8000 HSX


Shimano Sedona FJ C3000FJX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000D-CX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 5000D-CX vs Shimano Vanford FA C2500SAX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) FC 2500X


Shimano Vanford FA C2500SAX vs Shimano Sienna 1000X


Shimano Sahara FJ 500X vs Shimano Sedona FJ C3000FJX
