Delphin INKS 6000X vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 2500C - Spinning reel with front drag

Delphin INKS
Spinning
44.40 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.6 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag-
Weight400g / 14.11oz
Line retireve per crank-
Ball bearings3+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €25.95
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size6000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.22/490

Daiwa Sweepfire E 2500C - Spinning reel with front drag
Spinning
49.40 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.13 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag-
Weight260g / 9.17oz
Line retireve per crank80cm / 31.50 inch
Ball bearings1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €17.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofil0.25mm/190m
Conclusion
Both Daiwa Sweepfire E 2500C - Spinning reel with front drag and Delphin INKS 6000X score below average overall, indicating some compromises in total score and durability. If you must choose between them, Daiwa Sweepfire E 2500C - Spinning reel with front drag offers a slight edge in line retrieve per crank, while Delphin INKS 6000X may still be worth considering depending on specific preferences.
What's the difference between Delphin INKS and Daiwa Sweepfire E 2500C - Spinning reel with front drag?
Delphin INKS 6000X
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (3+1) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Daiwa Sweepfire E 2500C - Spinning reel with front drag
- With a score like 8.27 out of 10 (260g / 9.17oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- 6.43 out of 10 (80cm / 31.50 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
Similar comparisons

Daiwa Crossfire LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 3000DX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 3000DX


Daiwa Crossfire LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 4000D-CXH 4000D-CXHX


Shimano 21 Sustain 2500 HGFJX vs Daiwa 21 Presso LT 2000 SS-PX


Shimano 21 Sustain 2500 HGFJX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500DX


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Sahara FJ C 5000 XGX


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2000 S-XHX vs Delphin BRONZ 5000X


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2500-XHX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500DX


Delphin BRONZ 5000X vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2500-XHX


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2500-XHX


Shimano Sahara FJ C 5000 XGX vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2000 S-XHX


Daiwa 21 Presso LT 1000 S-PX vs Daiwa Crossfire LT 3000-CX


Delphin BRONZ 2000X vs Daiwa Crossfire LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 3000DX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500DX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500DX vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 2500D-HX


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 3000DX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000S-CX


Penn Battle III 3000X vs Daiwa Crossfire LT 3000-CX


Daiwa Crossfire LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 21 Presso LT 1000 S-PX


Shimano Sahara FJ C 5000 XGX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2500-XHX
