Delphin INKS 6000X vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 2500C - Spinning reel with front drag

Delphin INKS
Spinning
44.40 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.6 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag-
Weight400g / 14.11oz
Line retireve per crank-
Ball bearings3+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €25.95
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size6000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.22/490

Daiwa Sweepfire E 2500C - Spinning reel with front drag
Spinning
49.40 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.13 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag-
Weight260g / 9.17oz
Line retireve per crank80cm / 31.50 inch
Ball bearings1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €17.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofil0.25mm/190m
Conclusion
Both Daiwa Sweepfire E 2500C - Spinning reel with front drag and Delphin INKS 6000X score below average overall, indicating some compromises in total score and durability. If you must choose between them, Daiwa Sweepfire E 2500C - Spinning reel with front drag offers a slight edge in line retrieve per crank, while Delphin INKS 6000X may still be worth considering depending on specific preferences.
What's the difference between Delphin INKS and Daiwa Sweepfire E 2500C - Spinning reel with front drag?
Delphin INKS 6000X
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (3+1) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Daiwa Sweepfire E 2500C - Spinning reel with front drag
- With a score like 8.27 out of 10 (260g / 9.17oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- 6.43 out of 10 (80cm / 31.50 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
Similar comparisons

Shimano 21 Sustain 4000 FJX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 2500DX


Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CX


Abu GARCIA Zenon 1000 SX vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 4000DX vs Cormoran Spoon Trout 8PiF


Shimano Sedona FJ 2500SFJX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 2000 / JB4 0.13MM YELOW 2000X


Shimano Sahara 500 FI vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2000D(U)X


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 2000 / JB4 0.13MM YELOW 2000X vs Shimano Sedona FJ 2500SFJX


Cormoran Spoon Trout 8PiF vs Shimano 21 Sustain 3000 FJX


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 2000X vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000X


Abu GARCIA Zenon 1000 SX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 4000-CXHX


Cormoran Spoon Trout 8PiF vs Shimano Sedona FJ 2500SFJX


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 4000-CXHX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000X


Abu GARCIA Zenon 1000 SX vs Shimano Sahara 500 FI


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 2000X vs Shimano Sedona 2500 HG FI


Shimano Sahara 500 FI vs Daiwa Ninja LT 2500DX


Daiwa Ninja LT 2500DX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 2000X


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 4000DX vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CX


Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 4000DX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 2000 / JB4 0.13MM YELOW 2000X vs Shimano 21 Sustain 4000 FJX
