Delphin INKS 6000X vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Delphin INKS
Spinning
44.40 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.6 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag-
Weight400g / 14.11oz
Line retireve per crank-
Ball bearings3+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €25.95
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size6000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.22/490

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.56 out of 10
Ergonomics5.89 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight545g / 19.22oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €169.70
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size40
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 385/0.39
Conclusion
Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX clearly outshines Delphin INKS 6000X, offering significantly better performance in line retrieve per crank (102 centimeter / 40.16 inch) and weight (545g / 19,22oz). While Delphin INKS 6000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Delphin INKS and Penn Squall II Conventional?
Delphin INKS 6000X
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8 out of 10 (5.2:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX
- Scoring 8.18 out of 10 (545g / 19,22oz), this reel is impressively light for a multireel
- With a high retrieve rate of 9.47 out of 10 (102 centimeter / 40.16 inch), this reel is built for quick line recovery
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 3000-CXHX vs Shimano Torium 16HGA / Right handX


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 2000X vs Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 2000X


Shimano Ultegra C3000DX vs Shimano Torium 16HGA / Right handX


Shimano Cardiff 401A vs Shimano TWIN POWER FD C3000MHG


Shimano Cardiff 401A vs Shimano Tiagra 50WLRSAX


Shimano TLD II A 30 IIX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX


Daiwa Freams LT 5000D-CX vs Shimano Torium 16HGA / Right handX


Shimano FX 2500 FCX vs Shimano Stella FK 1000X


Shimano TWIN POWER FD C3000MHG vs Shimano FX 2500 FCX


Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX vs Shimano Stella FK 1000X


Shimano Tiagra 50WLRSAX vs Shimano Cardiff 401A


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX vs Penn International VISW 80 / Color: GoldX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2000X vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 3000-CXHX


Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 2000X vs Shimano Tiagra 30WLRSAX


Shimano Cardiff 401A vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2000X vs Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX


Shimano Ultegra C3000DX vs Shimano FX 2500 FCX


Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX vs Shimano TLD II A 30 IIX


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 2000X vs Shimano TWIN POWER FD C3000MHG


Shimano TLD II A 30 IIX vs Shimano Tiagra 50WLRSAX
