Delphin INKS 6000X vs Shimano Complex XR 2500 HGX

Delphin INKS
Spinning
44.40 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.6 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag-
Weight400g / 14.11oz
Line retireve per crank-
Ball bearings3+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €25.95
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size6000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.22/490

Shimano Complex XR
Spinning
89.20 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio6.0:1
Maximum drag4kg / 8.82lbs
Weight175g / 6.17oz
Line retireve per crank89 centimeter / 35.04 inch
Ball bearings10
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €215.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500 HG
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.18/100
Conclusion
Shimano Complex XR 2500 HGX clearly outshines Delphin INKS 6000X, offering significantly better performance in line retrieve per crank (89 centimeter / 35.04 inch) and maximum drag (4kg / 8,82lbs). While Delphin INKS 6000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Complex XR 2500 HGX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Delphin INKS and Shimano Complex XR?
Delphin INKS 6000X
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (3+1) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Shimano Complex XR 2500 HGX
- Designed with a light drag at 5.69 out of 10 (4kg / 8,82lbs), the reel is perfect when you're going after small fish or using ultralight setups
- With a score like 8.83 out of 10 (175g / 6,17oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- 8.4 out of 10 (89 centimeter / 35.04 inch) in line retrieve, means it picks up line fast, very handy when chasing quick fish
Similar comparisons

Shimano FX 3000 FCX vs Delphin CarbonIX 3000X


Shimano FX 3000 FCX vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2500SX


Delphin CarbonIX 3000X vs Shimano Twin Power XD A C 3000 XGX


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2500SX vs Penn Battle III 3000X


Daiwa Ninja LT 3000-CXHX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500X


Daiwa RX LT 3000-CX vs Shimano 20 Stella 6000 PGX


Penn Battle III 3000X vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CX


Shimano Sahara FJ 1000X vs Penn Battle III 3000X


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500X vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 5000-CX


Shimano Vanford FA 2500AX vs Shimano FX 3000 FCX


Shimano 20 Stella 4000 HGX vs Daiwa RX LT 3000-CX


Shimano Sedona FJ 4000XGFJX vs Shimano Sahara FJ 1000X


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2500SX vs Shimano FX 3000 FCX


Shimano FX 3000 FCX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500X


Daiwa Ninja LT 3000-CXHX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 4000XGFJX


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Vanford FA 2500AX


Shimano Sahara FJ 1000X vs Shimano 20 Stella 4000 HGX


Shimano 20 Stella 4000 HGX vs Shimano 20 Stella 6000 PGX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 2000DX vs Shimano 20 Stella 4000 HGX


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2500SX vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 4000D-CXHX
