Delphin INKS 6000X vs Shimano Exsence C 3000 MHGAX

Delphin INKS
Spinning
44.40 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.6 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag-
Weight400g / 14.11oz
Line retireve per crank-
Ball bearings3+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €25.95
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size6000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.22/490

Shimano Exsence
Spinning
95.00 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.4 out of 10
Gear ratio6.0:1
Maximum drag9kg / 19.84lbs
Weight180g / 6.35oz
Line retireve per crank88 centimeter / 34.65 inch
Ball bearings12
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €416.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC 3000 MHGA
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.25/125
Conclusion
Shimano Exsence C 3000 MHGAX clearly outshines Delphin INKS 6000X, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (9kg / 19,84lbs) and line retrieve per crank (88 centimeter / 34.65 inch). While Delphin INKS 6000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Exsence C 3000 MHGAX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Delphin INKS and Shimano Exsence?
Delphin INKS 6000X
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (3+1) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Shimano Exsence C 3000 MHGAX
- With a great drag score 9.2 out of 10 (9kg / 19,84lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- With a score like 8.8 out of 10 (180g / 6,35oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- 8.3 out of 10 (88 centimeter / 34.65 inch) in line retrieve, means it picks up line fast, very handy when chasing quick fish
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000-CXHX


Daiwa Crossfire LT 5000-CX vs Shimano Vanquish FC C3000MHGCX


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2500 S-XHX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 2500SX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2500X vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX


Daiwa Crossfire LT 5000-CX vs Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 2500SX vs Shimano 19 Stella 14000 XGX


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500 HGX vs Daiwa 19 Certate 2500-XHX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Vanquish FC C2500SCX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 3000-CXH(U)X vs Daiwa Regal LT 2500 DX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 2500SX vs Shimano Vanquish FC C2500SCX


Shimano Sienna 2500X vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500 HGX


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2500 S-XHX vs Daiwa Regal LT 2500 DX


Shimano Vanquish FC C2500SCX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500 HGX


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2500 S-XHX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500DX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2500X vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 500X


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa Regal LT 2500 DX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2500X


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Vanquish FC C3000MHGCX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2500X vs Shimano Twin Power FD C3000XGX


Shimano Twin Power FD C3000XGX vs Daiwa RX LT 3000-CX
