Delphin INKS 6000X vs Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Delphin INKS
Spinning
44.40 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.6 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag-
Weight400g / 14.11oz
Line retireve per crank-
Ball bearings3+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €25.95
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size6000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.22/490

Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A
Multireels
79.60 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.89 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio3.1:1
Maximum drag25kg / 55.12lbs
Weight1520g / 53.62oz
Line retireve per crank88 centimeter / 34.65 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €849.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size9000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.47/900
Conclusion
Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A clearly outshines Delphin INKS 6000X, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (25kg / 55,12lbs) and line retrieve per crank (88 centimeter / 34.65 inch). While Delphin INKS 6000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Delphin INKS and Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A?
Delphin INKS 6000X
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8 out of 10 (5.2:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (3+1) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A
- With a serious drag score of 10 out of 10 (25kg / 55,12lbs), this reel is made to stop big carp in their tracks, even in rough terrain or tight swims
- Scoring 8.53 out of 10 (88 centimeter / 34.65 inch), this reel pulls line in fast enough to keep you in control even during unpredictable runs
Similar comparisons

Shimano Sahara FJ 2500X vs Shimano TLD II A 30 IIX


Shimano Catana 2500 RC vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CXHX


Shimano Sahara FJ 2500X vs Shimano Sahara 4000 DH R


Shimano Tekota 501 HGA / Left-handedX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 5000-CX


Shimano 20 Stella 6000 PGX vs Shimano Talica II 12IIAX


Shimano TLD II A 30 IIX vs Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX


Shimano Torium 20PGAX vs Shimano TLD II A 30 IIX


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 5000-CX


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 4000D-CX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 5000D-CX


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX vs Shimano TLD II A 30 IIX


Shimano 20 Stella 6000 PGX vs Shimano Torium 20PGAX


Shimano Sahara 4000 DH R vs Daiwa Freams LT 5000D-CX


Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL vs Shimano Tiagra 50WAX


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX vs Shimano Tiagra 50WAX


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 4000D-CX vs Shimano Catana 2500 RC


Shimano Catana 2500 RC vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 5000D-CX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 5000-CX vs Shimano Talica II 12IIAX


Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL vs Shimano Tiagra 80WAX


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 3000D-CX vs Shimano 20 Stella 6000 PGX


Daiwa Freams LT 5000D-CX vs Shimano Tekota 501 HGA / Left-handedX
