Delphin INKS 6000X vs Shimano Ocea Conquest HG 201X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Delphin INKS
Spinning
44.40 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.6 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag-
Weight400g / 14.11oz
Line retireve per crank-
Ball bearings3+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €25.95
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size6000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.22/490

Shimano Ocea Conquest HG
Seafishing
201x
66.70 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics5.99 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight285g / 10.05oz
Line retireve per crank78 centimeter / 30.71 inch
Ball bearings11
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSeafishing
- Price range~ €477.10
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size201
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationLeft
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.24/200
Conclusion
Shimano Ocea Conquest HG 201X clearly outshines Delphin INKS 6000X, offering significantly better performance in line retrieve per crank (78 centimeter / 30.71 inch) and durability (9.5 out of 10). While Delphin INKS 6000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Ocea Conquest HG 201X is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Delphin INKS and Shimano Ocea Conquest HG?
Delphin INKS 6000X
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8 out of 10 (5.2:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (3+1) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Shimano Ocea Conquest HG 201X
- With a weight score of 9.19 out of 10 (285g / 10,05oz), this reel is impressively light for saltwater and provides great comfort
- A line retrieval (per crank) of 78 centimeter / 30.71 inch helps bringing in line quickly, making it great for repositioning or working topwater baits
- Built tough for the salt, ideal for seafishing.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 3000-CX


Shimano Spheros SW SP3000XGSWX vs Shimano 21 Stradic SW 5000 XGX


Shimano 19 Stella 10000 PGX vs Shimano Spheros SW SP3000XGSWX


Shimano 19 Stella 10000 PGX vs Shimano TLD 15X


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 1000X vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 3000DX


Daiwa Emblem Surf 45 SCW Type R vs Daiwa BG MQ 2500-HX


Shimano 21 TwinPower SW 6000X vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CX


Shimano TLD 15X vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX


Shimano 2020 Saragosa SW A 20000 PGX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 4000D-CX


Daiwa BG MQ 2500-HX vs Shimano 21 TwinPower SW 6000X


Shimano TLD 15X vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 1000X


Daiwa Ninja LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa BG MQ 2500-HX


Shimano 2020 Saragosa SW A 20000 PGX vs Shimano Stradic SWB 8000PGX


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 4000D-CX vs Penn Sargus II Spinning 2500X


Penn Sargus II Spinning 2500X vs Cormoran Big Cat 5PiF


Shimano 19 Stella 10000 PGX vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 3000DX


Daiwa BG MQ 2500-HX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 3000-CX


Daiwa BG MQ 2500-HX vs Daiwa 21 Certate SW (G) 5000-HX


Shimano TLD 15X vs Shimano 2020 Saragosa SW A 20000 PGX


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CX vs Shimano 21 TwinPower SW 6000X
