Delphin INKS 6000X vs Shimano Sahara FJ 4000X

Delphin INKS
Spinning
44.40 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.6 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag-
Weight400g / 14.11oz
Line retireve per crank-
Ball bearings3+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €25.95
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size6000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.22/490

Shimano Sahara FJ
Spinning
47.70 out of 100
Value for money2 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability7 out of 10
Ergonomics6.07 out of 10
Gear ratio4.7:1
Maximum drag11kg / 24.25lbs
Weight280g / 9.88oz
Line retireve per crank75 centimeter / 29.53 inch
Ball bearings4+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €71.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/180
Conclusion
Both Shimano Sahara FJ 4000X and Delphin INKS 6000X score below average overall, indicating some compromises in total score. If you must choose between them, Shimano Sahara FJ 4000X offers a slight edge in maximum drag, while Delphin INKS 6000X may still be worth considering depending on specific preferences.
What's the difference between Delphin INKS and Shimano Sahara FJ?
Delphin INKS 6000X
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8 out of 10 (5.2:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- Solid value at €25.95, reliable and great performance, it’s a smart choice for a variety of spinning fishing needs
Shimano Sahara FJ 4000X
- With a great drag score 10 out of 10 (11kg / 24,25lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- With a score like 8.13 out of 10 (280g / 9,88oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.71 out of 10 (75 centimeter / 29.53 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Shimano TWIN POWER FD C3000MHG vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 4000-CX


Shimano Catana FE 2500 HGX vs Delphin BRONZ 3000X


Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 2500DX


Shimano Ultegra C2000SDX vs Shimano Vanquish FC C2000SCX


Shimano Vanquish FC C3000XGCX vs Daiwa 19 Certate 3000D-CX


Daiwa BG 3500X vs Daiwa Lexa E LT 19 3000X


Daiwa BG 3500X vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 4000-CX


Shimano Sedona C2000 HG SFI vs Shimano Vanquish FC C2000SCX


Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 3000-C(U)X


Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SX vs Daiwa BG 3500X


Daiwa 19 Certate 3000D-CX vs Daiwa Freams LT 3000X


Shimano Sedona C2000 HG SFI vs Daiwa 19 Certate 3000D-CX


Delphin BRONZ 3000X vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 4000-CX vs Penn 2020 Clash II 1000X


Shimano Ultegra C2000SDX vs Daiwa 19 Certate 2500DX


Daiwa BG 3500X vs Daiwa Regal LT 1000 DX


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CX vs Penn 2020 Clash II 1000X


Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SX vs Shimano TWIN POWER FD C3000MHG


Daiwa 19 Certate 2500DX vs Shimano Sedona C2000 HG SFI
