Delphin INKS 6000X vs Shimano Sedona FJ C2000SHGFJX

Delphin INKS
Spinning
44.40 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.6 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag-
Weight400g / 14.11oz
Line retireve per crank-
Ball bearings3+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €25.95
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size6000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.22/490

Shimano Sedona FJ
Spinning
64.50 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability7 out of 10
Ergonomics6.28 out of 10
Gear ratio6.0:1
Maximum drag3kg / 6.61lbs
Weight215g / 7.58oz
Line retireve per crank79 centimeter / 31.1 inch
Ball bearings3+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €52.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC2000SHGFJ
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.16/105
Conclusion
Shimano Sedona FJ C2000SHGFJX clearly outshines Delphin INKS 6000X, offering significantly better performance in line retrieve per crank (79 centimeter / 31.1 inch) and maximum drag (3kg / 6,61lbs). While Delphin INKS 6000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Sedona FJ C2000SHGFJX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Delphin INKS and Shimano Sedona FJ?
Shimano Sedona FJ C2000SHGFJX
- Designed with a light drag at 5 out of 10 (3kg / 6,61lbs), the reel is perfect when you're going after small fish or using ultralight setups
- With a score like 8.57 out of 10 (215g / 7,58oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- 6.29 out of 10 (79 centimeter / 31.1 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 4000-CPX vs Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SHGX


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 2500X vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX


Shimano Vanquish FC 4000XGCX vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2000X


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 5000-CX


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 2500X vs Daiwa BG 5000X


Shimano Vanquish FC 4000XGCX vs Penn Battle III 6000X


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000-CXHX vs Penn Battle III 6000X


Daiwa BG 4500X vs Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 4000-CX


Delphin BRONZ 6000X vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 2500X


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 2500X vs Shimano Vanquish FC 4000XGCX


Daiwa BG 5000X vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2500D(U)X


Daiwa Freams LT 3000D-CX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 1000X


Penn Battle III 6000X vs Shimano Vanquish FC 4000XGCX


Shimano Vanquish FC 4000XGCX vs Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 4000-CX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 4000-CPX vs Shimano Vanquish FC 4000XGCX


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 2500X vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2000X


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 5000-CX vs Delphin BRONZ 6000X


Penn Battle III 6000X vs Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 2500X


Shimano Vanquish FC 4000XGCX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 5000-CX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2500D(U)X vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX
