Delphin INKS 6000X vs Shimano TLD 15X

The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Delphin INKS

Spinning

44.40 out of 100

Value for money3.5 out of 5

Quality classLow

Durability2.6 out of 10

Ergonomics4 out of 10

Gear ratio5.2:1

Maximum drag-

Weight400g / 14.11oz

Line retireve per crank-

Ball bearings3+1

Technical Specifications

BrandDELPHIN
The main category of the reelSpinning
Price range~ €25.95
Is saltwater resistantNo
Spare spoolNo
Reel size6000
Handle typeSingle handle
Drag typeFront drag
Handle orientationLeft, Right
Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.22/490

Shimano TLD

Seafishing

66.50 out of 100

Value for money4 out of 5

Quality classMedium

Durability8 out of 10

Ergonomics6.05 out of 10

Gear ratio4.0:1

Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs

Weight528g / 18.62oz

Line retireve per crank75 centimeter / 29.53 inch

Ball bearings4

Technical Specifications

BrandSHIMANO
The main category of the reelSeafishing
Price range~ €154.33
Is saltwater resistantYes
Spare spoolNo
Reel size15
Handle typeSingle handle
Drag typeLever drag
Handle orientationRight
Line capacity monofil-

Conclusion

Shimano TLD 15X clearly outshines Delphin INKS 6000X, offering significantly better performance in line retrieve per crank (75 centimeter / 29.53 inch) and durability (8 out of 10). While Delphin INKS 6000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano TLD 15X is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.

What's the difference between Delphin INKS and Shimano TLD?

Shimano TLD 15X

At 5 out of 10 (10kg / 22,05lbs), the drag is on the lighter side—suitable for smaller saltwater species or finesse-style presentations
Scoring 8.49 out of 10 (528g / 18,62oz), this reel is lighter than expected for a saltwater model, which helps on long sessions without extra strain
A line retrieval (per crank) of 75 centimeter / 29.53 inch helps bringing in line quickly, making it great for repositioning or working topwater baits
Built tough for the salt, ideal for seafishing.