Delphin INKS 6000X vs Shimano Twin Power FD 2500X

Delphin INKS
Spinning
44.40 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.6 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag-
Weight400g / 14.11oz
Line retireve per crank-
Ball bearings3+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €25.95
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size6000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.22/490

Shimano Twin Power FD
Spinning
88.60 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.56 out of 10
Ergonomics6.28 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag9kg / 19.84lbs
Weight215g / 7.58oz
Line retireve per crank78 centimeter / 30.71 inch
Ball bearings10
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €383.50
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.25/160
Conclusion
Shimano Twin Power FD 2500X clearly outshines Delphin INKS 6000X, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (9kg / 19,84lbs) and line retrieve per crank (78 centimeter / 30.71 inch). While Delphin INKS 6000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Twin Power FD 2500X is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Delphin INKS and Shimano Twin Power FD?
Delphin INKS 6000X
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (3+1) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Shimano Twin Power FD 2500X
- With a great drag score 9.2 out of 10 (9kg / 19,84lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- With a score like 8.57 out of 10 (215g / 7,58oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- 6.14 out of 10 (78 centimeter / 30.71 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2500X vs Daiwa Crossfire LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 1000X vs Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000 DHX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Sahara 4000 R


Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 500X vs Shimano Sedona FJ 4000XGFJX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 1000X vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 3000-CX


Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 2000X vs Shimano Vanquish FC C3000MHGCX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2500X vs Delphin BRONZ 3000X


Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 2000X vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2500X


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 2000D-XH 2000D-XHX vs Shimano Vanquish FC C3000MHGCX


Shimano FX 1000 FCX vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 500X


Daiwa Crossfire LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Ultegra C3000HGDX


Daiwa BG 4000X vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000D-CX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Ultegra C3000HGDX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000D-CX vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 500X


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2500X vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 1000X


Shimano Sahara 4000 R vs Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000 DHX


Shimano Ultegra C3000HGDX vs Shimano Vanquish FC C3000MHGCX


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 2000D-XH 2000D-XHX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 1000X


Shimano Sedona FJ 4000XGFJX vs Daiwa BG 4000X


Shimano Sahara 4000 R vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 2000D-XH 2000D-XHX
