Delphin INKS 6000X vs Shimano Twin Power FD C3000X

Delphin INKS
Spinning
44.40 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.6 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag-
Weight400g / 14.11oz
Line retireve per crank-
Ball bearings3+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €25.95
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size6000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.22/490

Shimano Twin Power FD
Spinning
88.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.56 out of 10
Ergonomics6.27 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag9kg / 19.84lbs
Weight220g / 7.76oz
Line retireve per crank78 centimeter / 30.71 inch
Ball bearings10
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €389.80
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC3000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.25/210
Conclusion
Shimano Twin Power FD C3000X clearly outshines Delphin INKS 6000X, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (9kg / 19,84lbs) and line retrieve per crank (78 centimeter / 30.71 inch). While Delphin INKS 6000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Twin Power FD C3000X is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Delphin INKS and Shimano Twin Power FD?
Delphin INKS 6000X
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (3+1) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Shimano Twin Power FD C3000X
- With a great drag score 9.2 out of 10 (9kg / 19,84lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- With a score like 8.53 out of 10 (220g / 7,76oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- 6.14 out of 10 (78 centimeter / 30.71 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
Similar comparisons

Shimano Sahara 1000 R vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 2500SX


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2000S-HX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 4000D-CX


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 4000D-CX vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2000X


Shimano Stella FK 2500 HGX vs Delphin IXTREK 2000X


Daiwa 19 Certate 3000D-CX vs Shimano Stella FK 2500 HGX


Daiwa 19 Certate 4000CXHX vs Shimano Sahara 1000 R


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 4000D-CX vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT6000X


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2000S-HX vs Shimano Sahara 3000 SS DH HG R


Delphin IXTREK 3000X vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 4000D-CX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CXHX vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2000S-HX


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2000S-HX vs Delphin IXTREK 3000X


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT6000X vs Shimano Ultegra C3000DX


Delphin INKS 3000X vs Daiwa 19 Certate 3000D-CX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500DX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 3000XGFEX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 2500SX vs Delphin INKS 3000X


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2000S-HX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500DX


Daiwa 19 Certate 3000D-CX vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2000X


Delphin INKS 3000X vs Delphin IXTREK 3000X


Shimano Sahara 1000 R vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 4000-CX
