Delphin INKS 6000X vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MFEX

Delphin INKS
Spinning
44.40 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.6 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag-
Weight400g / 14.11oz
Line retireve per crank-
Ball bearings3+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €25.95
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size6000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.22/490

Shimano Twin Power FE
Spinning
92.20 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.57 out of 10
Ergonomics6.13 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag11kg / 24.25lbs
Weight260g / 9.17oz
Line retireve per crank87 centimeter / 34.25 inch
Ball bearings9+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €396.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000MFE
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/120
Conclusion
Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MFEX clearly outshines Delphin INKS 6000X, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (11kg / 24,25lbs) and line retrieve per crank (87 centimeter / 34.25 inch). While Delphin INKS 6000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MFEX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Delphin INKS and Shimano Twin Power FE?
Delphin INKS 6000X
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (3+1) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MFEX
- With a great drag score 10 out of 10 (11kg / 24,25lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- With a score like 8.27 out of 10 (260g / 9,17oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- 8.2 out of 10 (87 centimeter / 34.25 inch) in line retrieve, means it picks up line fast, very handy when chasing quick fish
Similar comparisons

Shimano Aero BB C5000X vs Shimano Twin Power FE 2500SHGFEX


Shimano Sedona 8000 FI vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2500X


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2500X vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2500D(U)X


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CX vs Shimano FX 4000 FCX


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 3000-CX vs Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 2000X


Shimano Sedona 8000 FI vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500DX vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 1000D-XH 1000D-XHX


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500DX vs Shimano 20 Stella 4000 XGX


Shimano FX 4000 FCX vs Shimano Aero BB C5000X


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 2500SX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2500D(U)X


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 2500SHGFEX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 4000D-CX vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 5000D-C 5000D-CX


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 1000D-XH 1000D-XHX


Shimano Aero BB C5000X vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 4000D-CX


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 2500SX vs Shimano Aero BB C5000X


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 2500SX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 1000D-XH 1000D-XHX vs Shimano Aero BB C5000X


Shimano FX 4000 FCX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 2500SX


Shimano Aero BB C5000X vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 3000-CX


Penn Sargus II Spinning 2500X vs Shimano Sedona 8000 FI
