Delphin INKS 6000X vs Shimano Twin Power XD A C 3000 HGX

Delphin INKS
Spinning
44.40 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.6 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag-
Weight400g / 14.11oz
Line retireve per crank-
Ball bearings3+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €25.95
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size6000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.22/490

Shimano Twin Power XD A
Spinning
95.00 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.33 out of 10
Gear ratio6.0:1
Maximum drag9kg / 19.84lbs
Weight200g / 7.05oz
Line retireve per crank89 centimeter / 35.04 inch
Ball bearings11
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €359.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC 3000 HG
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.25/210
Conclusion
Shimano Twin Power XD A C 3000 HGX clearly outshines Delphin INKS 6000X, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (9kg / 19,84lbs) and line retrieve per crank (89 centimeter / 35.04 inch). While Delphin INKS 6000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Twin Power XD A C 3000 HGX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Delphin INKS and Shimano Twin Power XD A?
Delphin INKS 6000X
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (3+1) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Shimano Twin Power XD A C 3000 HGX
- With a great drag score 9.2 out of 10 (9kg / 19,84lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- With a score like 8.67 out of 10 (200g / 7,05oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- 8.4 out of 10 (89 centimeter / 35.04 inch) in line retrieve, means it picks up line fast, very handy when chasing quick fish
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500D-HX vs Daiwa Lexa E LT 19 3000X


Shimano Vanquish FC C3000MHGCX vs Mitchell 300 4000X


Delphin BRONZ 4000X vs Shimano Stella FK 4000 XGX


Daiwa Lexa E LT 19 3000X vs Shimano Stella FK 4000 MX


Daiwa Sweepfire E 3500C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Shimano Vanquish FC C3000MHGCX


Mitchell 300 4000X vs Daiwa Lexa E LT 19 3000X


Shimano Stradic GTM 3000S RC Spinning reel with fighting drag vs Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000X


Daiwa Sweepfire E 3500C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000X


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2500D(U)X vs Mitchell 300 4000X


Daiwa Lexa E LT 19 3000X vs Shimano Stella FK 4000 XGX


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT PC 2500X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2500X


Shimano Stella FK 4000 MX vs Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000X


Daiwa Sweepfire E 3500C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT PC 2500X


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2000DX vs Shimano Vanquish FC C3000MHGCX


Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QR 750X vs Shimano Stella FK 4000 MX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2500X vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 5000DX


Shimano Stella FK 4000 XGX vs Shimano Stradic GTM 3000S RC Spinning reel with fighting drag


Mitchell 300 4000X vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 3500C - Spinning reel with front drag


Shimano 21 Sustain 2500 HGFJX vs Shimano Stella FK 4000 XGX


Shimano 21 Sustain 4000 HGFJX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 3500C - Spinning reel with front drag
