Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 2000X vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Delphin IXCELA AL BODY
Spinning
60.10 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics6.1 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag-
Weight269g / 9.49oz
Line retireve per crank-
Ball bearings6+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €53.95
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.12/350

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.56 out of 10
Ergonomics5.89 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight545g / 19.22oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €169.70
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size40 LH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationLeft
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 385/0.39
Conclusion
Both Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 2000X and Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 2000X offers a gear ratio of 5.1:1, while Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX stands out for a line retrieve per crank of 102 centimeter / 40.16 inch. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Delphin IXCELA AL BODY and Penn Squall II Conventional?
Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 2000X
- Thanks to its 7 out of 10 (5.1:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX
- With a high retrieve rate of 9.47 out of 10 (102 centimeter / 40.16 inch), this reel is built for quick line recovery
Similar comparisons

Shimano Tiagra 30WLRSAX vs Shimano Tiagra 50AX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500DX vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 500X


Shimano Sedona FJ 4000FJX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 500 500X


Shimano Sedona FJ 4000FJX vs Shimano Torium 50HGA / Right HandX


Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 500X vs Shimano Tekota 501 HGA / Left-handedX


Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 500X vs Shimano Tiagra 50AX


Shimano Sedona FJ 500 500X vs Shimano Torium 16HGAL / Left-handedX


Shimano Tekota 500 HGA LCM / Right handX vs Shimano Torium 50HGA / Right HandX


Shimano Sedona FJ 4000FJX vs Shimano 20 Stella 4000 XGX


Shimano Tekota 500 HGA / Right handX vs Shimano Sahara FJ C 5000 XGX


Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 2000X vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500DX


Shimano Aero 4000X vs Shimano Tekota 501 HGA / Left-handedX


Shimano Catana FE C 3000X vs Shimano Tekota 500 HGA LCM / Right handX


Shimano Tiagra 16X vs Shimano Tekota 500 HGA / Right handX


Shimano Tekota 501 HGA / Left-handedX vs Shimano Tekota 500 HGA / Right handX


Shimano Sedona FJ 500 500X vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 500X


Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS vs Shimano 20 Stella 4000 XGX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500DX vs Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 2000X


Shimano Tekota 500 HGA LCM / Right handX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 4000FJX


Shimano Torium 16HGAL / Left-handedX vs Shimano Sahara FJ C 5000 XGX
