Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 3000X vs Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX

Delphin IXCELA AL BODY
Spinning
60.00 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics6.09 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag-
Weight273g / 9.63oz
Line retireve per crank-
Ball bearings6+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €54.95
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.14/360

Penn Battle III Long Cast
Spinning
8000 Lcx
53.60 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.59 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio4.0:1
Maximum drag13.6kg / 29,98lbs
Weight748g / 26.39oz
Line retireve per crank94 centimeter / 37.01 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €177.40
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size8000 LC
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.35/485
Conclusion
Both Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 3000X and Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 3000X offers a weight of 273g / 9,63oz, while Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX stands out for a line retrieve per crank of 94 centimeter / 37.01 inch. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Delphin IXCELA AL BODY and Penn Battle III Long Cast?
Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 3000X
- Thanks to its 7 out of 10 (5.1:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- With a score like 8.18 out of 10 (273g / 9,63oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX
- For 8 out of 10 (13,6kg / 29,98lbs) in drag score, the reel holds up well when you're battling strong fish or fishing near heavy cover
- 8.9 out of 10 (94 centimeter / 37.01 inch) in line retrieve, means it picks up line fast, very handy when chasing quick fish
Similar comparisons

Shimano Twin Power FE 2500FEX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2000DX


Shimano Catana 3000 SRC vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 4000D-CX


Shimano Sahara FJ 4000X vs Daiwa BG 4500X


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 5000D-CXHX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 3000X


Shimano Sahara FJ 4000X vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 3000X


Shimano Ultegra C3000DX vs Shimano Sedona FJ C3000HGFJX


Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 1000X vs Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 3000-CX


Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 500X vs Shimano Twin Power FE 2500FEX


Daiwa BG 4500X vs Shimano Catana 3000 SRC


Shimano Sahara FJ 4000X vs Shimano Sedona FJ C3000FJX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2500-XHX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 2500FEX


Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 4000D-CX


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 5000D-CXHX vs Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 3000-CX


Shimano Sahara FJ 4000X vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 2500D-HX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 3000X vs Shimano Twin Power FE 2500FEX


Shimano Catana 3000 SRC vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2500-XHX


Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 500X vs Shimano Sahara FJ 4000X


Shimano Ultegra C3000DX vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 500X


Shimano Sedona FJ C3000HGFJX vs Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 1000X


Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 1000X vs Shimano Twin Power FE 2500FEX
