Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 3000X vs Shimano Sedona FJ 4000FJX

Delphin IXCELA AL BODY
Spinning
60.00 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics6.09 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag-
Weight273g / 9.63oz
Line retireve per crank-
Ball bearings6+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €54.95
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.14/360

Shimano Sedona FJ
Spinning
46.10 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability7 out of 10
Ergonomics6.03 out of 10
Gear ratio4.7:1
Maximum drag11kg / 24.25lbs
Weight290g / 10.23oz
Line retireve per crank75 centimeter / 29.53 inch
Ball bearings3+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €60.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000FJ
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.35/130
Conclusion
Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 3000X clearly outshines Shimano Sedona FJ 4000FJX, offering significantly better performance in gear ratio (5.1:1) and ball bearings (6+1). While Shimano Sedona FJ 4000FJX may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 3000X is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Delphin IXCELA AL BODY and Shimano Sedona FJ?
Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 3000X
- Thanks to its 7 out of 10 (5.1:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
Shimano Sedona FJ 4000FJX
- With a great drag score 10 out of 10 (11kg / 24,25lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.71 out of 10 (75 centimeter / 29.53 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 4000D-CX vs Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 2000X


Delphin HORNET 60X vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 4000D-CX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2000DX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 4000D-CX


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2500X vs Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 2000X


Shimano Catana FE C 3000 HGX vs Shimano Sedona 6000 FI


Shimano Sahara FJ C 5000 XGX vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 4000D-CX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2000DX vs Shimano FX 4000 FCX


Shimano Sahara FJ C 5000 XGX vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2500X


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 5000D-CXHX vs Mitchell 300 4000X


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 4000D-CX vs Shimano Stella FK 2500X


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2000DX vs Mitchell 300 4000X


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 5000D-CX vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2500SX


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 5000D-CXHX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2000DX


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2500X vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 5000D-CXHX


Delphin HORNET 60X vs Shimano FX 4000 FCX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2000DX vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2500X


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2500SX vs Delphin HORNET 60X


Mitchell 300 4000X vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2000DX


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 4000D-CX vs Shimano Sedona 6000 FI


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2000DX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 5000D-CX
