Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 4000X vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2500X

Delphin IXCELA AL BODY
Spinning
47.50 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag-
Weight313g / 11.04oz
Line retireve per crank-
Ball bearings6+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €56.95
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.18/315

Daiwa 22 Exist LT
Spinning
88.70 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.47 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight160g / 5.64oz
Line retireve per crank72 centimeter / 28.35 inch
Ball bearings12
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €668.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.2/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2500X clearly outshines Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 4000X, offering significantly better performance in durability (9.5 out of 10) and maximum drag (5kg / 11,02lbs). While Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 4000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2500X is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Delphin IXCELA AL BODY and Daiwa 22 Exist LT?
Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 4000X
- With an outstanding bearing score of 9.33 out of 10 (6+1), the reel offers top tier smoothness. Ideal for anglers who appreciate premium feel
Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2500X
- A drag rating of 6.38 out of 10 (5kg / 11,02lbs) gives you steady control and it's perfect for most freshwater fish and light saltwater action
- With a score like 8.93 out of 10 (160g / 5,64oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.29 out of 10 (72 centimeter / 28.35 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 2500DX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 4000D-CX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 2000DX vs Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000X


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000D-CX vs Shimano 20 Stella 4000 XGX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 4000-C / JB4 0.25MM YELLOW 4000-CX vs Shimano 20 Stella 4000 XGX


Daiwa 19 Certate 3000DX vs Shimano Stella FK 1000X


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2500-XHX vs Daiwa 19 Certate 3000DX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000D-CX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 4000 HGX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 2000DX vs Shimano Sedona C2000 HG SFI


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 2500DX vs Penn Slammer IV 8500 HSX


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 2500DX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 4000-C / JB4 0.25MM YELLOW 4000-CX


Penn Slammer IV 8500 HSX vs Shimano Aero BB 4000X


Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000X vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 4000 HGX


Daiwa 19 Certate 3000DX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 1000DX


Shimano Vanford FA 2500SHGAX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 4000D-CX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 1000DX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 4000 HGX


Shimano 21 Sustain 3000 FJX vs Daiwa 19 Certate 3000DX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 1000DX vs Shimano Sedona C2000 HG SFI


Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000X vs Shimano 21 Sustain 3000 FJX


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2500-XHX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 1000DX vs Delphin INKS 5000X
