Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 4000X vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2500X

Delphin IXCELA AL BODY
Spinning
47.50 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag-
Weight313g / 11.04oz
Line retireve per crank-
Ball bearings6+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €56.95
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.18/315

Daiwa 22 Exist LT
Spinning
88.70 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.47 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight160g / 5.64oz
Line retireve per crank72 centimeter / 28.35 inch
Ball bearings12
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €668.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.2/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2500X clearly outshines Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 4000X, offering significantly better performance in durability (9.5 out of 10) and maximum drag (5kg / 11,02lbs). While Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 4000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2500X is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Delphin IXCELA AL BODY and Daiwa 22 Exist LT?
Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 4000X
- With an outstanding bearing score of 9.33 out of 10 (6+1), the reel offers top tier smoothness. Ideal for anglers who appreciate premium feel
Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2500X
- A drag rating of 6.38 out of 10 (5kg / 11,02lbs) gives you steady control and it's perfect for most freshwater fish and light saltwater action
- With a score like 8.93 out of 10 (160g / 5,64oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.29 out of 10 (72 centimeter / 28.35 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa Certate LT 19 5000D-XHX vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 2000X


Shimano Twin Power FE 5000XGFEX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT1000X


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 2500 / JB4 0.17MM YELLOW 2500X vs Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 XGX


Shimano Twin Power FE 5000XGFEX vs Delphin ELIXIR 2000X


Delphin IXPERA 2000X vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000XGFEX


Daiwa Regal LT 2500 DX vs Daiwa Certate LT 19 5000D-XHX


Delphin ELIXIR 2000X vs Shimano Sedona FJ 2500SFJX


Shimano Twin Power FE 4000XGFEX vs Delphin IXPERA 2000X


Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 2500X vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 1000DX


Shimano 20 Stella 6000 XGX vs Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X


Delphin IXPERA 2000X vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2500-DX


Shimano Ultegra C2000SHGDX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 2500 / JB4 0.17MM YELLOW 2500X


Delphin IXPERA 2000X vs Daiwa Ninja LT 5000-CX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 2500 / JB4 0.17MM YELLOW 2500X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT1000X


Daiwa Regal LT 2500 DX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 1000DX


Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 XGX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 5000-CX


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2500-DX vs Daiwa 17 Prorex LT 4000 D-CX


Shimano Ultegra C2000SHGDX vs Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 2500X


Shimano Sedona FJ 2500SFJX vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 2000X


Shimano Ultegra C2000SHGDX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 5000-CX
