Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 4000X vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000DX
Delphin IXCELA AL BODY
Spinning
47.50 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag-
Weight313g / 11.04oz
Line retireve per crank-
Ball bearings6+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €56.95
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.18/315
Daiwa 22 Exist LT
Spinning
95.00 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.33 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight200g / 7.05oz
Line retireve per crank82 centimeter / 32.28 inch
Ball bearings12
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €655.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000D
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.37/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000DX clearly outshines Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 4000X, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (10kg / 22,05lbs) and line retrieve per crank (82 centimeter / 32.28 inch). While Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 4000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000DX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Delphin IXCELA AL BODY and Daiwa 22 Exist LT?
Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 4000X
- With an outstanding bearing score of 9.33 out of 10 (6+1), the reel offers top tier smoothness. Ideal for anglers who appreciate premium feel
Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000DX
- With a great drag score 9.6 out of 10 (10kg / 22,05lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- With a score like 8.67 out of 10 (200g / 7,05oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- 6.71 out of 10 (82 centimeter / 32.28 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons
Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 2000X vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 3000-CXH(U)X
Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 3000-CXH(U)X vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2000S-HX
Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 2500SX vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 S x
Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 5000-CX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 1000X
Abu GARCIA Zenon 1000 SX vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 S x
Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 1000X vs Shimano Aero C3000X
Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 2000X vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2500X
Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 1000X
Shimano Sedona 2500 HG FI vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CX
Daiwa Freams LT 5000D-CX vs Daiwa Freams LT 2500DX
Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000 DHX vs Shimano Aero C3000X
Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2500X vs Daiwa Freams LT 2500DX
Delphin INKS 4000X vs Daiwa 21 Presso LT 2000 SS-PX
Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 S x vs Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000 DHX
Daiwa 21 Presso LT 2000 SS-PX vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2000S-HX
Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 5000-CX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2500X
Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000 DHX vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2000S-HX
Daiwa Freams LT 2500DX vs Shimano Sedona 2500 HG FI
Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 S x vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 3000-C(U)X
Daiwa Freams LT 5000D-CX vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 S x