Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 4000X vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500D-HX

Delphin IXCELA AL BODY
Spinning
47.50 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag-
Weight313g / 11.04oz
Line retireve per crank-
Ball bearings6+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €56.95
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.18/315

Daiwa 22 Exist LT
Spinning
95.00 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.43 out of 10
Gear ratio5.7:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight170g / 6oz
Line retireve per crank80 centimeter
Ball bearings12
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €661.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizePC 2500D-H
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500D-HX clearly outshines Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 4000X, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (10kg / 22,05lbs) and durability (9.5 out of 10). While Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 4000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500D-HX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Delphin IXCELA AL BODY and Daiwa 22 Exist LT?
Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 4000X
- With an outstanding bearing score of 9.33 out of 10 (6+1), the reel offers top tier smoothness. Ideal for anglers who appreciate premium feel
Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500D-HX
- With a great drag score 9.6 out of 10 (10kg / 22,05lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- With a score like 8.87 out of 10 (170g / 6oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- 6.43 out of 10 (80 centimeter) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 3000D-CXH 3000D-CXHX vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2500X-HX


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2500X vs Shimano Stella FK C 3000 M HGX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2000DX vs Shimano Ultegra C3000DX


Shimano Vanquish FC 2500SCX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CXHX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 5000D-CX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 5000-CX


Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 3000X vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2500X-HX


Daiwa Regal LT 2000 DX vs Abu GARCIA Revo MGX 20 SP/LX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2500X


Shimano Stella FK C 3000 M HGX vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 3000D-CXH 3000D-CXHX


Shimano Stella FK C 3000 M HGX vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2500X-HX


Delphin IXPERA 2000X vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 5000D-CX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CXHX


Mitchell 300 4000X vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 5000-CX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 5000-CX


Mitchell 300 4000X vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000S-HX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 5000D-CX vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2500X-HX


Shimano Vanquish FC 2500SCX vs Shimano Stella FK C 3000 M HGX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 5000D-CX vs Shimano Ultegra C3000DX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2000DX vs Daiwa 20 Luvias LT 3000D-CX


Delphin IXPERA 2000X vs Abu GARCIA Revo MGX 20 SP/LX
