Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 4000X vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500D-HX

Delphin IXCELA AL BODY
Spinning
47.50 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag-
Weight313g / 11.04oz
Line retireve per crank-
Ball bearings6+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €56.95
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.18/315

Daiwa 22 Exist LT
Spinning
95.00 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.43 out of 10
Gear ratio5.7:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight170g / 6oz
Line retireve per crank80 centimeter
Ball bearings12
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €661.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizePC 2500D-H
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500D-HX clearly outshines Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 4000X, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (10kg / 22,05lbs) and durability (9.5 out of 10). While Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 4000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500D-HX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Delphin IXCELA AL BODY and Daiwa 22 Exist LT?
Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 4000X
- With an outstanding bearing score of 9.33 out of 10 (6+1), the reel offers top tier smoothness. Ideal for anglers who appreciate premium feel
Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500D-HX
- With a great drag score 9.6 out of 10 (10kg / 22,05lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- With a score like 8.87 out of 10 (170g / 6oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- 6.43 out of 10 (80 centimeter) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Shimano Sahara 3000 SS DH HG R vs Shimano FX 4000 FCX


Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Shimano Twin Power FE 2000SFEX


Shimano 21 Sustain 3000 FJX vs Shimano Vanquish FC 4000XGCX


Penn 2020 Clash II 2000X vs Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 3000-CX


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 4000 HGX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2500X


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 4000 HGX vs Shimano Vanford FA C3000AX


Shimano FX 4000 FCX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CX


Shimano Sahara 3000 SS DH HG R vs Delphin ELIXIR 4000X


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 4000 HGX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2500X vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Vanford FA C3000AX


Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 3000X vs Shimano Twin Power FE 2000SFEX


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 4000 HGX vs Shimano Vanquish FC 4000XGCX


Shimano 21 Sustain 3000 FJX vs Shimano Sahara 3000 SS DH HG R


Shimano 21 Sustain 3000 FJX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CX


Daiwa BG 1500X vs Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 3000X


Shimano 21 Sustain 3000 FJX vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT PC 2500-HX


Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 3000X vs Shimano Vanquish FC 4000XGCX


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 4000 HGX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2500X vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 3000-CX
