Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 4000X vs Daiwa RX LT 2500X

Delphin IXCELA AL BODY
Spinning
47.50 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag-
Weight313g / 11.04oz
Line retireve per crank-
Ball bearings6+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €56.95
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.18/315

Daiwa RX LT
Spinning
57.30 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.71 out of 10
Ergonomics6.1 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight270g / 9.52oz
Line retireve per crank75 centimeter / 29.53 inch
Ball bearings2
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €32.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.1/200
Conclusion
Daiwa RX LT 2500X clearly outshines Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 4000X, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (10kg / 22,05lbs) and line retrieve per crank (75 centimeter / 29.53 inch). While Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 4000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa RX LT 2500X is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Delphin IXCELA AL BODY and Daiwa RX LT?
Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 4000X
- With an outstanding bearing score of 9.33 out of 10 (6+1), the reel offers top tier smoothness. Ideal for anglers who appreciate premium feel
Daiwa RX LT 2500X
- With a great drag score 9.6 out of 10 (10kg / 22,05lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- With a score like 8.2 out of 10 (270g / 9,52oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.71 out of 10 (75 centimeter / 29.53 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
Similar comparisons

Daiwa BG 1500X vs Shimano Catana FE 2500X


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000S-HX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2000-XHX


Daiwa 19 Certate 2500DX vs Shimano Stella FK 4000 XGX


Shimano Sedona FJ C3000FJX vs Delphin MonoDRAG 4000X


Shimano Catana FE 2500X vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000-XHX


Shimano Ultegra C3000DX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 5000-CX


Shimano Catana FE 2500X vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000S-HX


Shimano Ultegra C3000DX vs Delphin ELIXIR 5000X


Shimano Stella FK 4000 XGX vs Shimano Catana FE 2500X


Delphin ELIXIR 5000X vs Shimano Sedona FJ C3000FJX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 5000-CX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000S-HX


Shimano Ultegra C3000DX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 3000-CX


Daiwa Freams LT 6000D-HX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 3000-CXHX


Delphin MonoDRAG 4000X vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000-XHX


Shimano Ultegra C3000DX vs Shimano Sedona FJ C3000FJX


Shimano Catana FE 2500X vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 3000-CXHX


Shimano Ultegra C3000DX vs Daiwa GS LTD 4000X


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa 19 Certate 2500DX


Daiwa 19 Certate 2500DX vs Shimano Ultegra C3000DX
