Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 4000X vs Daiwa TANASENSOR
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Delphin IXCELA AL BODY
Spinning
47.50 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag-
Weight313g / 11.04oz
Line retireve per crank-
Ball bearings6+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €56.95
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.18/315

Daiwa TANASENSOR
Multireels
69.70 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.63 out of 10
Ergonomics5.93 out of 10
Gear ratio4.3:1
Maximum drag9kg / 19.84lbs
Weight520g / 18.34oz
Line retireve per crank74 centimeter / 29.13 inch
Ball bearings1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €189.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.41/380
Conclusion
Daiwa TANASENSOR clearly outshines Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 4000X, offering significantly better performance in line retrieve per crank (74 centimeter / 29.13 inch) and durability (8.63 out of 10). While Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 4000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa TANASENSOR is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Delphin IXCELA AL BODY and Daiwa TANASENSOR?
Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 4000X
- With an outstanding bearing score of 9.33 out of 10 (6+1), the reel offers top tier smoothness. Ideal for anglers who appreciate premium feel
Daiwa TANASENSOR
- At a maximum drag of 9kg / 19,84lbs (scoring 5.51 out of 10), the reel has a modest drag setup which is enough for smaller fish or relaxed situations where finesse matters more
- Scoring 8.27 out of 10 (520g / 18,34oz), this reel is impressively light for a multireel
- A score of 6.29 out of 10 (74 centimeter / 29.13 inch) gives a decent speed but doess not rush a lot
- Ready for saltwater, great for any multireels adventure.
Similar comparisons

Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX vs Shimano Sedona 6000 FI


Shimano Torium 30HGA / Right handX vs Shimano Tekota 501 HGA / Left-handedX


Shimano 20 Stella 5000 HGX vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 3000CXHX


Shimano Torium 16HGAL / Left-handedX vs Daiwa 24 IPRIMI LT 2000 S-PX


Shimano Sahara 2500 R vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX


Daiwa 24 IPRIMI LT 2000 S-PX vs Delphin INKS 3000X


Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX vs Shimano Sahara 2500 R


Shimano Tiagra 80WAX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 1000DX vs Shimano Tyrnos 30 II


Shimano Tekota 501 HGA / Left-handedX vs Shimano Sedona 6000 FI


Shimano 20 Stella 5000 HGX vs Delphin INKS 3000X


Shimano Tiagra 80WAX vs Daiwa Tanacom 500


Daiwa 24 IPRIMI LT 2000 S-PX vs Shimano Tiagra 80WAX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 1000DX vs Shimano Torium 30HGA / Right handX


Shimano Tyrnos 30 II vs Shimano 20 Stella 5000 HGX


Daiwa Tanacom 500 vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 3000CXHX


Shimano 20 Stella 5000 HGX vs Shimano Sahara 2500 R


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 3000CXHX vs Shimano Tiagra 130AX


Mitchell MX2 Spinning 3000X vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 1000DX vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 3000CXHX
