Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 4000X vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Delphin IXCELA AL BODY
Spinning
47.50 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag-
Weight313g / 11.04oz
Line retireve per crank-
Ball bearings6+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €56.95
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.18/315

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.56 out of 10
Ergonomics5.89 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight545g / 19.22oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €169.70
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size40 LH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationLeft
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 385/0.39
Conclusion
Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX clearly outshines Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 4000X, offering significantly better performance in line retrieve per crank (102 centimeter / 40.16 inch) and weight (545g / 19,22oz). While Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 4000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Delphin IXCELA AL BODY and Penn Squall II Conventional?
Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 4000X
- Thanks to its 7 out of 10 (5.1:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX
- Scoring 8.18 out of 10 (545g / 19,22oz), this reel is impressively light for a multireel
- With a high retrieve rate of 9.47 out of 10 (102 centimeter / 40.16 inch), this reel is built for quick line recovery
Similar comparisons

Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX vs Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 PGX


Shimano Twin Power XD A C 3000 XGX vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 3000D-CXH 3000D-CXHX


Shimano Sedona FJ 4000FJX vs Shimano Tiagra 50WAX


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 3000D-CXH 3000D-CXHX vs Shimano TALICA II A 20IIAX


Shimano Tiagra 50WAX vs Shimano Sahara 500 FI


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 3000D-CXH 3000D-CXHX vs Shimano Sahara 500 FI


Shimano Torium 16HGA / Right handX vs Shimano TALICA II A 20IIAX


Shimano Torium 16HGA / Right handX vs Shimano Twin Power XD A C 3000 XGX


Shimano Twin Power XD A C 3000 XGX vs Shimano Sahara 500 FI


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 3000-CXHX vs Shimano Sedona FJ C3000HGFJX


Shimano TALICA II A 20IIAX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 20IIX


Shimano Sedona FJ 4000FJX vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2500X


Shimano TALICA II A 20IIAX vs Shimano Sahara 500 FI


Shimano Tiagra 50WAX vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 3000D-CXH 3000D-CXHX


Shimano Talica II 16IIAX vs Shimano Sahara 500 FI


Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 vs Shimano Tyrnos 30 II


Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 vs Shimano Sahara 500 FI


Shimano Sahara 500 FI vs Shimano Tyrnos 30 II


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2500X vs Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000


Shimano Tiagra 50WAX vs Shimano Sedona FJ C3000HGFJX
