Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 4000X vs Shimano Sahara FJ 4000X

Delphin IXCELA AL BODY
Spinning
47.50 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag-
Weight313g / 11.04oz
Line retireve per crank-
Ball bearings6+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €56.95
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.18/315

Shimano Sahara FJ
Spinning
47.70 out of 100
Value for money2 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability7 out of 10
Ergonomics6.07 out of 10
Gear ratio4.7:1
Maximum drag11kg / 24.25lbs
Weight280g / 9.88oz
Line retireve per crank75 centimeter / 29.53 inch
Ball bearings4+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €71.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/180
Conclusion
Both Shimano Sahara FJ 4000X and Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 4000X score below average overall, indicating some compromises in total score. If you must choose between them, Shimano Sahara FJ 4000X offers a slight edge in maximum drag, while Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 4000X may still be worth considering depending on specific preferences.
What's the difference between Delphin IXCELA AL BODY and Shimano Sahara FJ?
Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 4000X
- Thanks to its 7 out of 10 (5.1:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- Decent value at €56.95, it covers the basics, making it a great option for beginners or casual spinning setups
Shimano Sahara FJ 4000X
- With a great drag score 10 out of 10 (11kg / 24,25lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- With a score like 8.13 out of 10 (280g / 9,88oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.71 out of 10 (75 centimeter / 29.53 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Shimano Stella FK 2500 S HGX vs Delphin IXTREK 3000X


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 4000D-CX vs Daiwa RX LT 2500X


Shimano Twin Power FE 4000PGFEX vs Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 XGX


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 4000D-CX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2000D(U)X


Shimano Twin Power FE 4000PGFEX vs Daiwa Crossfire LT 3000-CX


Shimano 21 Sustain 4000 FJX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 1000DX


Daiwa 24 IPRIMI LT 2000 S-PX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2000X


Daiwa BG 2000X vs Delphin IXTREK 3000X


Daiwa Crossfire LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 4000D-CX


Daiwa BG 2000X vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500DX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2000X vs Daiwa 24 IPRIMI LT 2000 S-PX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 3000-CXHX vs Penn Sargus II Spinning 2500X


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2000X vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2000D(U)X


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 2000DX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2000X


Shimano 21 Sustain 4000 FJX vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 4000D-CX


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500DX vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 3000CXHX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2000X vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000PGFEX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2000D(U)X vs Daiwa BG 2000X


Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500DX vs Daiwa 24 IPRIMI LT 2000 S-PX


Daiwa BG 2000X vs Shimano Stella FK 2500 S HGX
