Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 4000X vs Shimano Sedona FJ 4000FJX

Delphin IXCELA AL BODY
Spinning
47.50 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag-
Weight313g / 11.04oz
Line retireve per crank-
Ball bearings6+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €56.95
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.18/315

Shimano Sedona FJ
Spinning
46.10 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability7 out of 10
Ergonomics6.03 out of 10
Gear ratio4.7:1
Maximum drag11kg / 24.25lbs
Weight290g / 10.23oz
Line retireve per crank75 centimeter / 29.53 inch
Ball bearings3+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €60.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000FJ
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.35/130
Conclusion
Both Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 4000X and Shimano Sedona FJ 4000FJX score below average overall, indicating some compromises in total score. If you must choose between them, Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 4000X offers a slight edge in gear ratio, while Shimano Sedona FJ 4000FJX may still be worth considering depending on specific preferences.
What's the difference between Delphin IXCELA AL BODY and Shimano Sedona FJ?
Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 4000X
- Thanks to its 7 out of 10 (5.1:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
Shimano Sedona FJ 4000FJX
- With a great drag score 10 out of 10 (11kg / 24,25lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- With a score like 8.07 out of 10 (290g / 10,23oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.71 out of 10 (75 centimeter / 29.53 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500-XHX vs Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 PGX


Penn Battle III 8000 HSX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 1000D-XHX


Shimano Ultegra C3000DX vs Delphin CarbonIX 1000X


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500DX


Delphin CarbonIX 1000X vs Shimano Twin Power FE 2000SFEX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 1000DX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT3000-CXHX


Penn Battle III 8000 HSX vs Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 PGX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 5000-CX vs Shimano Sahara 3000 SS DH HG R


Shimano Sahara 3000 SS DH HG R vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 3000DX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500DX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 5000-CX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 5000-CX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 1000DX


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 1000D-XHX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 1000DX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 1000DX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500-XHX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 1000DX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500DX


Shimano Ultegra C3000DX vs Shimano 20 Stella 4000 XGX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500DX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 3000-C(U)X


Penn Battle III 8000 HSX vs Shimano 20 Stella 4000 XGX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 1000DX


Daiwa Sweepfire E 5000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Shimano Sahara 3000 SS DH HG R


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 5000-CX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000-CX
