Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 4000X vs Shimano Ultegra C3000XGDX

Delphin IXCELA AL BODY
Spinning
47.50 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag-
Weight313g / 11.04oz
Line retireve per crank-
Ball bearings6+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €56.95
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.18/315

Shimano Ultegra
Spinning
75.80 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.27 out of 10
Gear ratio6.4:1
Maximum drag9kg / 19.84lbs
Weight220g / 7.76oz
Line retireve per crank94 centimeter / 37.01 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €132.00
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC3000XGD
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/130
Conclusion
Shimano Ultegra C3000XGDX clearly outshines Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 4000X, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (9kg / 19,84lbs) and line retrieve per crank (94 centimeter / 37.01 inch). While Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 4000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Ultegra C3000XGDX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Delphin IXCELA AL BODY and Shimano Ultegra?
Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 4000X
- Thanks to its 7 out of 10 (5.1:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
Shimano Ultegra C3000XGDX
- With a great drag score 9.2 out of 10 (9kg / 19,84lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- With a score like 8.53 out of 10 (220g / 7,76oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- 8.9 out of 10 (94 centimeter / 37.01 inch) in line retrieve, means it picks up line fast, very handy when chasing quick fish
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2500X-HX vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CX


Daiwa Sweepfire E 3000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CX


Daiwa Sweepfire E 3000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Daiwa Ninja LT 2500-XHX


Daiwa Freams LT 3000D-CX vs Delphin IXTREK 2000X


Daiwa Ninja LT 2500-XHX vs Shimano Sahara FJ 500X


Daiwa Ninja LT 2500-XHX vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500DX


Daiwa Ninja LT 2500-XHX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 3000-CXH(U)X


Daiwa Ninja LT 2500-XHX vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2500X-HX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT3000-CX vs Shimano Sahara FJ 500X


Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 3000X vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 3000C - Spinning reel with front drag


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 2000DX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT3000-CX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 5000-CX vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CX


Shimano Sahara 2500 R vs Shimano Sahara FJ 500X


Shimano Sahara 2500 R vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2500X-HX


Shimano Sahara FJ 500X vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000-XHX


Shimano Sahara FJ 500X vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2500X-HX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 5000-CX vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2500X-HX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000-XHX vs Shimano Sahara 2500 R


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 3000-CXH(U)X vs Daiwa Ninja LT 2500-XHX


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2500X-HX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT3000-CX
