Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 5000X vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 3000D-CX

Delphin IXCELA AL BODY
Spinning
45.90 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.0:1
Maximum drag-
Weight334g / 11.78oz
Line retireve per crank-
Ball bearings6+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €59.95
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size5000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.22/440

Daiwa 20 Airity LT
Spinning
95.00 out of 100
Value for money5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.35 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight195g / 6.88oz
Line retireve per crank77 centimeter / 30.31 inch
Ball bearings8
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €262.80
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000D-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.33/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 20 Airity LT 3000D-CX clearly outshines Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 5000X, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (10kg / 22,05lbs) and line retrieve per crank (77 centimeter / 30.31 inch). While Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 5000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 20 Airity LT 3000D-CX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Delphin IXCELA AL BODY and Daiwa 20 Airity LT?
Daiwa 20 Airity LT 3000D-CX
- With a great drag score 9.6 out of 10 (10kg / 22,05lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- With a score like 8.7 out of 10 (195g / 6,88oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- 6 out of 10 (77 centimeter / 30.31 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CXHX vs Penn Sargus II Spinning 2500X


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500X vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 3000X


Shimano 21 Sustain 2500 FJX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX


Shimano Complex XR 2500 HGX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000 HGX


Shimano Sahara 3000S R vs Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 4000X


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500X vs Shimano Vanquish FC C2000SCX


Penn Sargus II Spinning 2500X vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500X


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 2000DX vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CX


Shimano Complex XR 2500 HGX vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 S x


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CXHX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500X


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CXHX vs Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 PGX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 4000-CX vs Shimano 19 Stella 20000 PGX


Shimano 21 Sustain 2500 FJX vs Shimano Sahara 3000S R


Daiwa Freams LT 5000D-CX vs Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 PGX


Shimano Vanquish FC C2000SCX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500X


Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 3000X vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Twin Power FD 1000X


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000 HGX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CXHX


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 2000DX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500X
