Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 5000X vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000DX

Delphin IXCELA AL BODY
Spinning
45.90 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.0:1
Maximum drag-
Weight334g / 11.78oz
Line retireve per crank-
Ball bearings6+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €59.95
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size5000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.22/440

Daiwa 22 Exist LT
Spinning
95.00 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.33 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight200g / 7.05oz
Line retireve per crank82 centimeter / 32.28 inch
Ball bearings12
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €655.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000D
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.37/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000DX clearly outshines Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 5000X, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (10kg / 22,05lbs) and line retrieve per crank (82 centimeter / 32.28 inch). While Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 5000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000DX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Delphin IXCELA AL BODY and Daiwa 22 Exist LT?
Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 5000X
- With an outstanding bearing score of 9.33 out of 10 (6+1), the reel offers top tier smoothness. Ideal for anglers who appreciate premium feel
Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000DX
- With a great drag score 9.6 out of 10 (10kg / 22,05lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- With a score like 8.67 out of 10 (200g / 7,05oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- 6.71 out of 10 (82 centimeter / 32.28 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Shimano Ultegra C3000DX vs Shimano Ultegra C2000SDX


Shimano Catana 2500 RC vs Abu GARCIA Revo MGX 20 SP/LX


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 5000DX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CXHX


Shimano Ultegra C3000DX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CXHX


Daiwa Certate LT 19 5000D-XHX vs Daiwa BG 8000X


Penn Slammer IV 8500 HSX vs Delphin FRIZ


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 5000DX vs Shimano Ultegra C3000DX


Shimano Sahara FJ 500X vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 3500C - Spinning reel with front drag


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CXHX vs Shimano Sahara FJ 4000 XGX


Daiwa Ninja LT 4000-CX vs Penn Slammer IV 8500 HSX


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 5000DX vs Daiwa Certate LT 19 5000D-XHX


Shimano Ultegra C2000SDX vs Daiwa BG 8000X


Abu GARCIA Revo MGX 20 SP/LX vs Shimano Sahara FJ 4000 XGX


Shimano Catana 2500 RC vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CXHX


Abu GARCIA Revo MGX 20 SP/LX vs Shimano Catana 2500 RC


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CXHX vs Shimano Sahara 3000 SS DH HG R


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CXHX vs Shimano Ultegra C2000SDX


Penn Slammer IV 8500 HSX vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 5000DX


Shimano Sahara 3000 SS DH HG R vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CXHX


Shimano Sahara 3000 SS DH HG R vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 2000DX
